Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 13:33, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 01:04:21PM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > So do we think this reached any kind of consensus? Can I start deleting > > code related to source ISOs? > > After basically a month with no genuine requirements / use c

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 01:04:21PM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > So do we think this reached any kind of consensus? Can I start deleting > code related to source ISOs? After basically a month with no genuine requirements / use cases identified, yes. > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 00:27, Lukasz Ze

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-30 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Please proceed deleting it. Our online & cold storage are covering all possible requirements needed. On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 00:05, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > So do we think this reached any kind of consensus? Can I start deleting code > related to source ISOs? > > Cheers, > mwh > > On Fri,

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
So do we think this reached any kind of consensus? Can I start deleting code related to source ISOs? Cheers, mwh On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 00:27, Lukasz Zemczak wrote: > Hey Michael! > > I basically +1 what Steve said. To add a bit more to this, the current > source-iso machinery doesn't take snaps

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-04 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
On Thu, Jan 4 2024 at 09:30:05 -08:00:00, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 08:28:28AM -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: On 1/4/2024 8:21 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > With my flavor lead hat on, as far as I know, there's not a single > > official community flavor that is runni

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 08:28:28AM -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > On 1/4/2024 8:21 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > With my flavor lead hat on, as far as I know, there's not a single > > > official community flavor that is running their own mirror, > > https://xubuntu.org/download/ > If you invest

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 04:36:54PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > I thought these are generated as a point in time snapshot; because we > otherwise had no other point in time snapshots available. And hence we > archived these with binary isos to old-releases.ubuntu.com especially > after thin

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 03:42, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > Hello release team, > > In the course of recent refactorings of ubuntu-cdimage / debian-cd we somehow > broke the building of source ISOs. I doubt this is anything very deep and can > surely be fixed but there is another option: stop b

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-04 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
On 1/4/2024 8:21 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: With my flavor lead hat on, as far as I know, there's not a single official community flavor that is running their own mirror, https://xubuntu.org/download/ If you investigate those mirrors, those are *not* run by the individual flavor. In fact, they

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 07:46:25AM -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > Not release team, and I don't mean to hijack the thread, but... > On 1/3/2024 8:55 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > As you point out, the image files are not being distributed together. > > Mirrors of releases.ubuntu.com don't get the

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-04 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Hi all! Not release team, and I don't mean to hijack the thread, but... On 1/3/2024 8:55 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: As you point out, the image files are not being distributed together. Mirrors of releases.ubuntu.com don't get these source ISOs; and where community flavors are running their own

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-04 Thread Lukasz Zemczak
Hey Michael! I basically +1 what Steve said. To add a bit more to this, the current source-iso machinery doesn't take snaps into consideration, so the resulting isos weren't fully compliant anyway - especially after we adopted so many snaps on our images. The source iso codebase was in general unm

Re: discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 04:41:43PM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Hello release team, > In the course of recent refactorings of ubuntu-cdimage / debian-cd we > somehow broke the building of source ISOs. I doubt this is anything very > deep and can surely be fixed but there is another option:

discontinuing source ISOs?

2024-01-03 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hello release team, In the course of recent refactorings of ubuntu-cdimage / debian-cd we somehow broke the building of source ISOs. I doubt this is anything very deep and can surely be fixed but there is another option: stop building source ISOs. AFAIU the point of a source ISO is GPL-compliance