I'd like to bring the release team's attention to this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xchat/+bug/1753169
This seems like a matter where people are getting quite personally
and emotionally involved, so I think it's probably best for most of us
to stay out of it and leave it to our
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2018, 22:01 + schrieb Robie Basak:
> I'd like to bring the release team's attention to this bug:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xchat/+bug/1753169
>
...
> if a decision needs to be made, that decision should probably be made
> before Bionic's releas
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:01:32PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> I'd like to bring the release team's attention to this bug:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xchat/+bug/1753169
>
> This seems like a matter where people are getting quite personally
> and emotionally involved, so I think
Hello,
>I've added this to the TB agenda. I imagine it'll take quite a bit of
>reading of the various references (I've added them to the agenda item)
>so appreciate you may not be able to decide by tomorrow's meeting.
just to give my quick maintainer point of view.
1) the security issues it has
Hi Robie, Gianfranco,
Lacking quorum, there was no actual TB meeting the other week. However, as
I noted on IRC, I also don't consider this a matter requiring the Technical
Board's input. In the first instance, this falls within the purview of the
archive team, and I'm happy for us to field it a
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:01 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> we still don't have a clean upgrade path from xchat to hexchat, at least for
> configuration files.
I don't give much weight to this reason since xchat wasn't in Ubuntu
16.04 LTS. Therefore, there is no upgrade problem.
Thanks,
Jere
n Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 06:01:38AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >An IRC client, in its default mode of operation, requires zero
> >authentication of a remote server. The server must therefore be
> >considered untrusted and potentially hostile. Even *with*
> >authentication, a remote serv
Hello Steve and all,
>Lacking quorum, there was no actual TB meeting the other week. However, as
>I noted on IRC, I also don't consider this a matter requiring the Technical
>Board's input. In the first instance, this falls within the purview of the
>archive team, and I'm happy for us to field
