The same problem. I have a smb share on server which is public and writeable,
and with fstab like this:
//server/pub/media/pub smbfs
guest,uid=1000,rw,iocharest=utf8,file_mode=0775,dir_mode=0777 0 0
only root can write to /media/pub (even though 1000 is uid of normal user).
Thanks, closing main task then.
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Should use /dev/urandom instead of /dev/random
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225333
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need
to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments.
Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't
hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report
you can click on
Marcin, the unmount on shutdown problem has been noted elsewhere (bug
#211631) and is probably a mis-ordering of the shtudown script.
--
no way to read and write files on mounted samba share on hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210741
You received this bug notification because you are a
No - but the server I connect to is using the workround I mentioned
above.
--
[Hardy] Update from alpha 3 to alpha 4 broke ssh connections to openbsd boxes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187473
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
no way to read and write files on mounted samba share on hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Hi Ante,
Ante Karamatic wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2008 14:23:31 -0500
Dustin Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the purpose of fluxbox, openbox, xfce, enlightenment (etc...) on
server? It's not like you have some point and click application for
setting up apache virtual website or psotfix
After our border gateway hard drive crashed yesterday, we installed
Hardy Alternate CLI on an old spare server which served honorably on
the work bench testing hardware. We installed openssh-server and ebox*
(mostly) and moved to a workstation.
After dealing with network interfaces and adding one
On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 08:52 +0100, Paul Elliott wrote:
Ante Karamatic wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2008 14:23:31 -0500
Dustin Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the purpose of fluxbox, openbox, xfce, enlightenment (etc...) on
server? It's not like you have some point and click application
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 06:34:51AM -0700, MJang wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 08:52 +0100, Paul Elliott wrote:
I strongly believe a CLI installer should always be present
for any software that might end up on a server. Unfortunately it's also
something outside of our control.
Yup, Red
I think that is necessary for creating virtual machines following Ubuntu
Server guide, isn't it?
https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/serverguide/C/libvirt.html
Cheers, Leandro.
2008/5/3 James Dinkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 06:34:51AM -0700, MJang wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-03
On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 06:34 -0700, MJang wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 08:52 +0100, Paul Elliott wrote:
Ante Karamatic wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2008 14:23:31 -0500
Dustin Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the purpose of fluxbox, openbox, xfce, enlightenment (etc...) on
server?
On Sat, 3 May 2008 12:15:07 -0300
Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that is necessary for creating virtual machines following
Ubuntu Server guide, isn't it?
If you are talking about virt-manager, then no. virt-manager is a tool
you'll use on you workstation and
I'm talking about virt-install, which will open a VNC connection to the
machine and only allow connections from localhost.
Cheers, Leandro.
2008/5/3 Ante Karamatic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 3 May 2008 12:15:07 -0300
Leandro Pereira de Lima e Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that is
I find people who think in terms of a few servers will at times find a
desktop GUI compelling, but once you move to hundreds or thousands of
servers the idea of connecting into a desktop GUI on each machine to
administer is beyond ridiculous.
I think GUIs are fine but only if they can be
It looks like Landscape (http://www.canonical.com/projects/landscape)
does some things, but it is missing an important requirement:
* Open source
It appears from the way that it is described that you need a support
contract with Canonical to use it.
I've never used Landscape but it appears
On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 15:31 -0700, Martin Hess wrote:
I find people who think in terms of a few servers will at times find a
desktop GUI compelling, but once you move to hundreds or thousands of
servers the idea of connecting into a desktop GUI on each machine to
administer is beyond
17 matches
Mail list logo
