Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Mark Schouten
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 06:27 +0900, Onno Benschop wrote: > I'm not saying that their solution is crap, I'm saying that they're > telling me one thing and offering me another. They're telling me the > machine is a real server, "it's running Open Solaris was the mantra", > but when I actually want to

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Mark Schouten
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 13:57 +1030, Karl Goetz wrote: > > There's also a cli, I've been told. > > I've dealt with equipment before with a web UI which did stuff, then a > CLI which was a few 'reset password' level of commands. > Not saying the Sun box is like that, just that "it has a cli" doesnt >

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread David Miller
Fair enough I can see your points. I think what makes the Sun solution open is that it's running x86 hardware. You're free to install what ever OS/Software you want on the hardware. Just don't expect anything more than hardware support from Sun if you choose to do that. This is more than you ca

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Onno Benschop
On 19/11/08 08:13, David Miller wrote: > I still think you're missing the point. The problem was not what Sun said > or is trying to sell you but with your pre-conception of what they were > selling you. While it is technically a "server" it is really a storage > appliance that just happens to be

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Karl Goetz
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 19:59 +0100, Mark Schouten wrote: > Hi Onno, and all. See my reaction inline... > > > On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 17:18 +0900, Onno Benschop wrote: > If anything in what I write here is > > contradicted by what Sun says, perhaps you should ask Sun before relying > > on what I sai

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Karl Goetz
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 07:45 -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote: > Why doesn't this surprise me? When Sun Microsystems started on their > "open source" escapade, I was excited. A proprietary company turning > over a new leaf. However, over the past few years, all I've seen is Sun has always done *lots* of

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread David Miller
I still think you're missing the point. The problem was not what Sun said or is trying to sell you but with your pre-conception of what they were selling you. While it is technically a "server" it is really a storage appliance that just happens to be based on Open Solaris and ZFS. So the technol

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Onno Benschop
On 19/11/08 03:59, Mark Schouten wrote: > >> So, coming in the door thinking, wow, Sun has an Open Storage system >> that might be able to be managed and deployed in a Ubuntu Server >> environment, I went out the door thinking, Sun has built a system that >> could be really nice, but instead they'v

Re: CUPS and 426 upgrade required error - gutsy server

2008-11-18 Thread Onno Benschop
On 17/09/08 18:30, Onno Benschop wrote: > I'm seeing a "426 upgrade required" for cups on a gutsy server. I found > bug 44931, which says that it's fixed. I can see the directory and the > symlinks that are described here: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cupsys/+bug/44931/comments/14, >

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Mark Schouten
Hi Onno, and all. See my reaction inline... On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 17:18 +0900, Onno Benschop wrote: > Some disclaimers up front. I am an IT consultant, that is, I solve weird > and wonderful problems for weird and wonderful clients all around the > world, but mostly rural and remote Australia. I'

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Aaron Toponce
Why doesn't this surprise me? When Sun Microsystems started on their "open source" escapade, I was excited. A proprietary company turning over a new leaf. However, over the past few years, all I've seen is proprietary solutions using open source products, such as what you've described here. Rather

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Matt Isaacs
> > > Thank you for sharing this with us. It's sure inspirational, but > getting to the dissapointments you shared further down the line, I > think to myself. Isn't easier to just build your own storage > applience? I mean, there are so many open source project which allow > you to setup a NFS / SA

Re: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Onno Benschop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Today I attended a Sun presentation called "Open Storage Systems". I > attended both for my "day-job", that is, an IT consultant, as well as > wearing my "Ubuntu Server hat". I'm not able to provide you with a > word-for-w

RE: Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Andrew Hodgson
Hi, Maybe I am still wet behind the ears (only having around 6 years exposure to enterprise IT environments), but I am slightly more excited about this type of technology. For me, I like to be able to choose the kit that various applications run on, and pick the relevant hardware for the job.

Report: Sun Open Storage

2008-11-18 Thread Onno Benschop
Today I attended a Sun presentation called "Open Storage Systems". I attended both for my "day-job", that is, an IT consultant, as well as wearing my "Ubuntu Server hat". I'm not able to provide you with a word-for-word, blow-by-blow account of my morning, nor am I wanting to either promote or bag