Just to chime in here, yes, fasthosts may be causing you trouble. Your
VM has a different MAC, so if they're doing anything with smart
switches which only allow certain mac addresses on certain ports. They
could be blocking you. It might be worth while to call them and ask if
you need to let them k
Soren,
Good timing! I was just about to write another email as I've been playing
with this all evening - alas still no joy.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Jamie McDonald wrote:
> > The output of 'brctl show' on the host is as fol
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Jamie McDonald wrote:
> The output of 'brctl show' on the host is as follows
>
> ## START brctl output ###
>
> $brctl show
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
> br0 8000.001999705a61 no e
Bill wrote:
> I think mrtg is a little better. It graphs it out for ya so you can see
> where the peaks are. It is a fantastic tool to see in a quick glance
> what is going on with traffic and loads. If your working in say a data
> center where you need to monitor several routers you can graph e
+ Jamie McDonald :
> You are correct, I cannot ping the gateway from the guest -
> however I can from the host.
Maybe the host is blocking traffic from the guest interface
with iptables? I used to add -i eth0 on every iptables rule
before trying kvm. If that's the case, you should remove
them or
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010, Mark Foster wrote:
> I'm looking over https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
> Notice how 8.04.1, 8.04.x get released on some seemingly random schedule.
> Is it the same for 10.04.x? What is the criteria for a point release?
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/146
"We also co
I'm looking over https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
Notice how 8.04.1, 8.04.x get released on some seemingly random schedule.
Is it the same for 10.04.x? What is the criteria for a point release?
--
I hate racists. Mark D. Foster
http://mark.foster.cc/ | http://www.freegeekseattle.org/
--
Soren,
You are correct, I cannot ping the gateway from the guest - however I can
from the host.
The output of 'brctl show' on the host is as follows
## START brctl output ###
$brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.001999705a61 n
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 08:49:10AM +0100, Jamie McDonald wrote:
> These changes have been enabled and I can still ssh between both the
> host and the guest, but still no external conectivity for the guest.
Just to be clear, you can't even ping e.g. 88.208.248.1, right?
Can you provide the output
> Please suggest/guide further and let me know the correct and the best
> practices to block ipp2p traffic
>
>
Check out opendns.com. You can block file sharing web sites.
--
Regards
--
Gerald Drouillard
Technology Architect
Drouillard& Associates, Inc.
htt
On 9 June 2010 09:49, Jamie McDonald wrote:
> These changes have been enabled and I can still ssh between both the host
> and the guest, but still no external conectivity for the guest.
Did you run a traceroute? Also Consider running tcotraceroute over a port
you know for sure to be open.
--
Soren,
Thanks for your response and well spotted with the network mask, must have
got tired staying up playing with this so late!!
I have updated the network address on the host the /etc/network/interfaces
file now reads
## START /etc/network/interfaces file on HOST ##
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet
sorry, the correct name is bandwidthd
2010/6/9 Fabio T. Leitao
> I also know (and use in a customer firewall) bandwithd... it plots a decent
> web report of traffic per network, per IP, several protocols...
>
> 2010/6/8 Bill
>
> I think mrtg is a little better. It graphs it out for ya so you ca
I also know (and use in a customer firewall) bandwithd... it plots a decent
web report of traffic per network, per IP, several protocols...
2010/6/8 Bill
> I think mrtg is a little better. It graphs it out for ya so you can see
> where the peaks are. It is a fantastic tool to see in a quick glan
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 09:14 +0200, Peter van Arkel wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jun 2010, lzantal wrote:
>
> > I am trying to install 10.04LTS on 3 sata hdd with software raid 5.
> > The install goes without any issue but when I try to boot into the new
> > system it fails to boot.
>
> Is /boot also on
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010, lzantal wrote:
> I am trying to install 10.04LTS on 3 sata hdd with software raid 5.
> The install goes without any issue but when I try to boot into the new
> system it fails to boot.
Is /boot also on the raid5 array? This generally doesn't tend to work well
unless it's a
16 matches
Mail list logo
