Re: apache2ctl v. systemctl [action] apache2.service

2019-07-23 Thread Leroy Tennison
This has been my experience with systemd and other daemons, if systemd (systemctl) wasn't used to make the change (maybe 'service' was used or 'kill') then systemd erroneously assumes that nothing has changed and doesn't check reality. From: ubuntu-server on

Re: apache2ctl v. systemctl [action] apache2.service

2019-07-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi there, On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:50 AM Bill Parker wrote: > > What are the pros/cons of using > > apache2ctl stop|start|restart|etc > > instead of > > systemctl start|stop|restart|etc apache2.service I recall two recent bugs related to your question: "systemd unable to detect running apache

apache2ctl v. systemctl [action] apache2.service

2019-07-23 Thread Bill Parker
What are the pros/cons of using apache2ctl stop|start|restart|etc instead of systemctl start|stop|restart|etc apache2.service commands? I'm more used to using apache2ctl myself (well, apachectl as was!) but is this just a (stolen from perl) example of "there's more than one way to do it"? --