Re: Bug triage report for 2021-01-11 (Tuesday triage)

2021-01-12 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for the feedback Thomas and Robie. I removed the server-triage-discuss tag. On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:18 PM Robie Basak wrote: > I replied in the bug. > > My view: > > 1. It is common that a configuration change away from default requires > more than one configuration file to be changed

Re: Bug triage report for 2021-01-11 (Tuesday triage)

2021-01-12 Thread Robie Basak
I replied in the bug. My view: 1. It is common that a configuration change away from default requires more than one configuration file to be changed so as not to break the system. This is one of those cases. Another common case, for example, is that having a service bind to an address often requi

Re: Bug triage report for 2021-01-11 (Tuesday triage)

2021-01-12 Thread Thomas Ward
We had further discussions and had determined in IRC discussions that this was an 'edge case' and 'odd configuration'. If we want to have a discussion on this, you may need to loop me in on this - it's an issue that we have in the juggling between "should we fix this" and "this is a non-standa

Bug triage report for 2021-01-11 (Tuesday triage)

2021-01-12 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Bugs last updated on 2021-01-11 (Monday) Date range identified as: "Tuesday triage" Found 22 bugs Most of bugs are taken care by other people, the only one I want to mention is this one: https://pad.lv/1743592 - (Won't Fix) [nginx] - NGINX fails to start/install/upgrade if IPv6 is c

Re: Bug Triage - Monday 11th January

2021-01-12 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Monday, January 11 2021, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > sssd - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1910611 > It seems our (default in complain mode) apparmor profile is out of > date. The required change is known and an update should be easy. So I > subscribed the team and tagged s

Re: Bug Triage Report (Friday 8th January)

2021-01-12 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Friday, January 08 2021, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Samba 1892145 > This was an unclear crash for a while, but a user crash analysis LGTM and > with that I found an existing upstream fix. Needs SRUs to Focal and Groovy. > I marked it server-next, Sergio could you look at these SRUs? Thanks, C