On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:59:53AM +0100, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:19:32PM -0700, Mathias Gug wrote:
Boot Support for Degraded RAID
kirkland has been working on adding RAID support to grub-install. His patch
is
waiting for sponsoring. He hopes it will
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Kees Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As mentioned, a timeout to the handler's question could be added using
the -t option to read (which is supported in busybox, thankfully):
ANS=unanswered
read -p Boot with degraded RAID anyway? [y/N]: -r ANS -t 15
I had
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:14:01PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
[2]: http://launchpad.net/~ebox-unstable/+archive
I tried to have a look at ebox-mail there and the orig.tar.gz is
missing. I'm not quite sure how this is possible, but I think it
would be more useful if Launchpad would
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:19:32PM -0700, Mathias Gug wrote:
Boot Support for Degraded RAID
kirkland has been working on adding RAID support to grub-install. His patch is
waiting for sponsoring. He hopes it will make it for alpha4 scheduled to be
released on Thursday. If so mathiaz
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:00:45AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
[2]: http://launchpad.net/~ebox-unstable/+archive
I tried to have a look at ebox-mail there and the orig.tar.gz is
missing. I'm not quite sure how this is possible, but I think it
would be more useful if Launchpad would actually
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears from that if this feature is not enabled, the system will fail
hard to an initramfs shell. Instead, how about giving the user the option
to continue?
Good idea, Matt.
See:
*
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:59:53 +0100
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears from that if this feature is not enabled, the system will
fail hard to an initramfs shell. Instead, how about giving the user
the option to continue?
Interaction on a remote server without internet
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Ante Karamatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:59:53 +0100
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears from that if this feature is not enabled, the system will
fail hard to an initramfs shell. Instead, how about giving the user
the
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 02:53:51PM +0200, Ante Karamatic wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:59:53 +0100
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears from that if this feature is not enabled, the system will
fail hard to an initramfs shell. Instead, how about giving the user
the option
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:26:27 -0300
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then isn't dropping to an initramfs shell equally useless?
It is. I've misunderstood Matt's proposal. I taught the idea was to
replace all configuration options with interactive prompt. Sorry for
confusion...
--
Hi,
Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online with
the irc logs here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20080812.
Remove multiuser options and updating init scripts
zul reminded that the multiuser option is no longer supported in
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 20:19, Mathias Gug wrote:
Hi,
Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online with
the irc logs here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20080812.
...
New eBox packages
foolano gave an update on the ebox packages: ebox-mail,
12 matches
Mail list logo
