ubuntu-server-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com>>
on behalf of Andreas Hasenack
mailto:andr...@canonical.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:57 AM
Cc: ubuntu-server
mailto:ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 performance
CAUTION: This email
-server
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 performance
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
I've seen this slugginesh too, but half expected it, since
ponse in
> virt-manager was far worse.
>
> --
> *From:* ubuntu-server on behalf
> of Andreas Hasenack
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:57 AM
> *Cc:* ubuntu-server
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 performance
>
>
ponse in
> virt-manager was far worse.
>
> --
> *From:* ubuntu-server on behalf
> of Andreas Hasenack
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:57 AM
> *Cc:* ubuntu-server
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 performance
>
>
installed the VM
from the downloaded iso and that response in virt-manager was far worse.
From: ubuntu-server on behalf of
Andreas Hasenack
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:57 AM
Cc: ubuntu-server
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 performance
CAUTION
Do you mean the vm is sluggish, or the virt-manager tool?
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:52 AM Leroy Tennison
wrote:
> I realize it's "just released" but have noticed something which is almost
> impossible to document in a bug report. Performance using virt-manager is
> sluggish at best whereas
I realize it's "just released" but have noticed something which is almost
impossible to document in a bug report. Performance using virt-manager is
sluggish at best whereas there are no apparent issues via an ssh connection.
Might want to see if you can reproduce that. This is a server
