On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:24:34AM -0400, Etienne Goyer wrote:
> It seems like the acl package got demoted to universe in karmic. Does
> someone knows the rationale behind that decision?
acl itself was never seeded. It was in main due to it being a dependency
of hal. With 0.5.13-1ubuntu1, hal dro
Jorge Armando Medina wrote:
> Intersting, where did you read this info? we use acls for almost every
> fileservers we install for windows ACLs compatibility.
apt-cache policy acl
--
Etienne Goyer
Technical Account Manager - Canonical Ltd
Ubuntu Certified Instructor
~= Ubuntu: Linux for Human
Etienne Goyer wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> This is not quite the place to ask, but as I am not subscribed to
> ubuntu-devel, I will start here and move on there should I must.
>
> It seems like the acl package got demoted to universe in karmic. Does
> someone knows the rationale behind that decis
Hello everybody,
This is not quite the place to ask, but as I am not subscribed to
ubuntu-devel, I will start here and move on there should I must.
It seems like the acl package got demoted to universe in karmic. Does
someone knows the rationale behind that decision? It seems like a
pretty easy