No, you understand it right, the bug is also about /etc/tomcat6/Catalina
and /etc/tomcat6/Catalina/localhost not being created (empty) by tomcat6
but only by the tomcat6 webapps, so if you don't install any webapp,
then you can't use autodeploy.
However, the debdiff does create "/etc/tomcat6/Catal
The server team discussed this at UDS and plans to do what is necessary
to make eBox installable in Intrepid via an SRU (Stable Release Update:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates). Getting a minimal patch
to fix it for Jaunty, based on the notes at
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
Nagios3 is in Main, so the maintainer should be set to Ubuntu Core
Devlopers, not MOTU. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField
for details. Other than that, it looks good. I'd probably sponsor it
(and just make that change myself), except I'm just about to collapse
and head to bed.
-
** Attachment added: "Debian -> ubuntu debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20459042/debian.debdiff
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-5028
--
Please merge nagios3_3.0.6-1ubuntu1 from debian
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nagios3
Debian has a new version to be merged
** Affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
--
Please merge nagios3_3.0.6-1ubuntu1 from debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308434
You received this bug no
OK. I repeated Tomek's smbclient tests and got the same results as he did. I
also noticed as Tomek did that
smb: \> ls *.txt list all files, as does smb: \> ls *.* and smb: \> ls * and
smb : \> ls
In other words it seems that if the "*" character is the first one after
the smb "ls" (list) com
Tomek's results are interesting, I will have to see if I get the same
effect.
I tried something a little different. I uninstalled all the Samba
packages except for libsmbclient and libwbclient0. Removal of either of
these packages would also result in the removal of 17-20 other packages
on my syst
** Summary changed:
- DHCP requires manual configuration for KT (Korean ISP)
+ MAC address is not included in DHCP request, requiring manual configuration
for certain ISPs (e.g., KT)
** Changed in: dhcp3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => Low
Status: New => Confirmed
--
MAC address is no
I can confirm this bug, using an up to date Ubuntu 8.10, the typo is on
line 51 of the man page
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Typo in ssh_config man page
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303835
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
I've just noticed that adding a parameter to 'ls' has quite interesting
results.
smb: \> ls *.txt
(lists all files)
smb: \> ls test.*
SUCCESS - 0 listing \test.*
smb: \> ls test.txt
cli_list_new: Error: unable to parse name from info level 1
cli_list_new: unable to parse name from info level 1
I'm trying to get some informations from my landrive tech support. I've
provided them with the technical data they have requested (model HD9-U2LA based
on RDC R2882-G chip if anyone's interested) and waiting for a response.
As for the new samba packages:
1. reading seems to work fine now - I ca
Iomega support have responded but seem to think this is only an Ubuntu
issue, which I doubt.
If there is a bug in there CIFS server which is preventing write access
I would love to be able to provide them with details so they can
produces a firmware upgrade for their drive.
--
gvfsd-smb crashed
Hi,
I tested the latest patch (2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4~ppa3), my NAS is an Iomega
Home Network HD 500gb ( Previewed URL: http://is.gd/bQv1- ).
Reading of the hard disk is now working.
When writing I get a "No space left on device" error.
I can provide more details if necessary.
My NAS is firmware u
Public bug reported:
The router does not recognize the hostname of dhcp client.
The hostname command gives me the correct hostname.
I have to change the following in /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf: send host-name
"";
must be changed into: send host-name "my hostname";
Everything works fine then, the r
Hm, our initial guess is that these NAS disks all run the same CIFS
server, which doesn't handle what our smbclient is sending and dies,
giving back a "disk full" error. It should be unrelated to the segfault
this bug is about, though. I'm still trying to contact the person who
initially added that
SRU Ack, please upload.
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
tomcat6 does not include tomcat-dbcp.jar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283852
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in
This debdiff doesn't actually create /etc/tomcat6/Catalina, just changes
its permissions. The bug description sounds as if it is completely
missing?
If I misunderstood this, and the problem is really just wrong
permissions, please go ahead and upload.
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
This bug was fixed in the package bind9 - 1:9.5.0.dfsg.P2-1ubuntu3
---
bind9 (1:9.5.0.dfsg.P2-1ubuntu3) intrepid-proposed; urgency=low
* Port LaMont Jones' IPv6 fix to Intrepid. (LP: #249824)
-- Matt LaPlanteTue, 02 Dec 2008 22:52:17 -0600
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu Intrepi
This bug was fixed in the package lsscsi - 0.19-1ubuntu1
---
lsscsi (0.19-1ubuntu1) intrepid-proposed; urgency=low
* Added fixes for scsi subsystem changes in 2.6.27. (LP: #282518)
-- Chuck ShortWed, 03 Dec 2008 11:18:05 -0500
** Changed in: lsscsi (Ubuntu Intrepid)
St
Hi everyone.
same behavior as last comment with my Conceptronic NAS disk. with patch
(only smbclient and smbfs installed) I can now read, but not write.
Anyway it's a huge enhancement for me! :-D
Thanks for all.
^_Pepe_^
--
gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net
P.S.: I cut the lines of the log because I did not want to publish the
IP-address here. The lines continue with the IP, port and "ssh2"
--
sshd hacked in only 50,000 tries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58074
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, whic
Actually I had the same problem some days ago. Only that my root account
was hacked with only 400 attempts.
I used the alternate installation Cd of Ubuntu 8.10, but I was not asked
for a root password. Here's a piece of my log:
> Dec 6 00:11:52 cfm sshd[7961]: Failed password for root from
> ..
This problem still appears in 8.10.
There's a bug at samba's bugzilla about it
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4370 .
--
umount.cifs doesn't remove entry from /etc/mtab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
https://b
Thierry and Kai:
Preliminary tests with the most recent patch (2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4~ppa3) of samba
shows the following:
Read access to my NAS works as expected in Nautilus and read access using
smclient in a terminal works. However, a put access (ie write access) using
smbclient still returns an
Proposed fix as 6.0.18-0ubuntu5 (posted in bug 300691, waiting for main
sponsoring)
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Thierry Carrez (tcarrez)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
tomcat6-examples stops tomcat6 during installation - auto-deployement should be
us
Proposed debdiff (also fixes bug 302914).
tomcat6 (6.0.18-0ubuntu5) jaunty; urgency=low
* Removed tomcat6-[admin,docs,examples].post[inst,rm] and let Tomcat webapp
autodeployment features handle application load/unload (LP: #302914)
* tomcat6-instance-create, tomcat6-instance-create.1, co
samba - 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4~ppa3 from
https://launchpad.net/~tcarrez/+archive is compiled with the patch from
Kai Blin on comment 33, for those interested in testing.
--
gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943
You received this bug notification because you
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 279709 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279709
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 279709
dpkg - process_queue: Assertion 'dependtry <=4' failed. error
--
package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 failed to install/upgrade: package samba is
not rea
29 matches
Mail list logo
