I confirm that the version in hardy-proposed fixes the reload issue.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
Reload action on init script kills daemon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Jonathan, thanks for taking the time to post an exhaustive reply.
I'm creating a new VM right now to do a complete test as you suggested,
but as that's not going to reproduce our real world situation, I'm going
to post the details of the actual machine where the thing is happening.
Later on I'll
erhm, of course in my test script in the odbc_exec function I've
specified the connection parameter, I just missed it here in the
comment.
--
Unable to remove Suhosin patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
Darn there should be an edit function for comments here...
I forgot to mention an essential thing, the ubuntu release is the AMD64 one.
--
Unable to remove Suhosin patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
Dear Jamie,
Thanx for your reply but i wonder why i'm unable to install it as it
should. although i've purged it once and reinstall it. but the error
remains. One thing i'd like to share with u is that i'm using Webmin and
i've installed Dovecot through the interface available within. and from
** Also affects: dhcp3 (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
dhclient-script fails with apparmor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400349
You received this bug notification because you are
This turns out to be a regression in Jaunty, that is now fixed and
behaving properly in Karmic
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
dhclient-script fails with apparmor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400349
You received this bug notification because you are
This is a bug in the handling of profile attachment for scripts. The
check to test if an attachment has already been applied needs to be
reworked for 2.6.28. This regression is mitigated, in that correct
attachment is retained if ix is used for the script interpreter which is
standard profiling
Hi Julian.
Can you tell me, how I'm gonna do this upgrade from Jaunty do Karmic.
Thanks.
From: Julian Lam julian@gmail.com
To: paspalj...@yahoo.com
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 7:06:38 PM
Subject: [Bug 383697] Re: lsb_release crashed with ImportError in
Ok I was able to reproduce the problem on a new VM
Steps:
1) Create fresh vm: done, installed Ubuntu 8.04.2 amd64 as denoted by
# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS (it shows .3 because I issued the command
after the update I
Just for the record: It's not suhosin patch which needs to be removed,
it's the php or php extension which needs fixing, since corrupted canary
means that there is stack/buffer overflow somewhere. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stackguard#Canaries
--
Unable to remove Suhosin patch
To be honest it wouldn't be a problem for me if the simulation mode
actually worked. I don't really mind if the odbc functions are badly
coded (or whatever). What I do mind is suhosin breaking my scripts
without a way to prevent it which doesn't include recompiling php
without the patch.
But of
I've reproduced the problem on a 9.04 amd64 fully updated, same
configuration as above.
--
Unable to remove Suhosin patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
--
Thanks for opening this bug report.
Most of the daemons you've listed run as superuser as that is the only
way to have the necessary privileges for them to operate correctly. In
some cases, the daemons are protected by AppArmor profiles. This is the
case with cups and dhcp3.
If you have
Ondrej, sure as soon as I'm done with this vm I'm building I'll try with
i386.
It's not that I don't care, but as we're migrating tons of stuff around
and this migration has to be finished soon, I really need the odbc thing
working asap, so that's why I don't mind the buffer overflow for now, if
If that is the only way, then the software is bad, and needs to be fixed
or replaced.
I do not want an insecure system and potentially exploitable system
because of a setup with badly isolated processes and crappy software
that requires superuser privileges.
X.org can be fixed so it wont need to
Public bug reported:
L'erreur suivante s'est produite lors d'une mise à jour des packages:
package mysql-server-5.0 5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu10.2 failed to
install/upgrade: le sous-processus post-installation script a retourn?
une erreur de sortie d'?tat 1
Cette erreur est survenue la première
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29285327/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29285328/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package mysql-server-5.0 5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu10.2 failed to
install/upgrade: le
Feel free to open bugs with upstream software if you think they need
fixing. If they need to be replaced, feel free to open bugs here and
suggest adequate replacements.
Of course we want to reduce the quantity of software running as root. As
such, as soon as it is feasible to run X.org without
19 matches
Mail list logo