Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nut
Hi,
While I was investigating a FTBFS in collectd:
...
configure:22249: checking for upscli_connect in -lupsclient
configure:22274: i686-linux-gnu-gcc -o conftest -Wall -g -O2
Patch that fix the error and make collectd more buildable (there is
still an error because of gcc4.5 that I'll fix after the fix for nut is
uploaded)
** Patch added: nut.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/743484/+attachment/1945330/+files/nut.debdiff
** Changed in:
Squid does not use /var/tmp.
** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596041
Title:
/var/tmp is not cleared
** Bug watch added: Squid Bugzilla #2741
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2741
** Also affects: squid via
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2741
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Regardless the apparmor profile for this package should include /tmp
right?
** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
I was asked privately whether I found a solution. We wasted too much
time trying to convince people that we had a credible problem report,
and then it seemed that no one was prepared to actually do anything with
the information. After that time waste, we decided to give up on
RLimitCPU on
Actually I seemed to have asked about 10.10, but looking at the bug description
again you already stated it was 10.10 that you were using, sorry about that. I
have marked this bug as Triaged as there is quite a bit of information here and
I believe there is enough information from yourself to
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738968
Title:
Can't See Parts of DFS CIFS Share
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: exim4
Try to install smokeping
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Mar 26 19:17:47 2011
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné
une erreur de sortie d'état 1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743763
Title:
package exim4-config (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a
Still happening in natty amd64
I have to start nmbd manually for full network share (load and
access)...
using the mkdir -p fix did not resolve...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 18:23 +, Cypher2 wrote:
Still happening in natty amd64
I have to start nmbd manually for full network share (load and
access)...
using the mkdir -p fix did not resolve...
I suspect you're hitting a different issue, please file a separate bug report.
Cheers,
actually no.. same issue: when i start the system, only smbd is loaded as
process. when looking at /var/run/samba it is active and populated with no
nmbd PID file. only when I switch to console and run 'sudo start nmbd' that
it loads a process and assigns PID to it.
when I restart or shutdown
** Changed in: openbios-sparc (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423910
Title:
openbios-sparc has no installation candidate
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
just after updgrade 10.10 to 11.04
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743821
Title:
package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile a retourné
Public bug reported:
Steps to reproduce:
$ ssh badname@localhost # hit 'enter' three times to fail logging in.
$ sudo lastb
Expected outcome:
lastb reports something similar to:
badnamessh:pts/1localhostSun Mar 27 17:01 - 17:01 (04:00)
just as it does when a bad login attempt is made
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743858
Title:
sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
A known quirk of sshd in other distros is that sshd will refuse to write
to world- or group-readable /var/log/btmp. The fix for this is 'chmod
0600 /var/log/btmp'.
Ubuntu Linux installs /var/log/btmp with permissions 0660 (aka -rw-
rw). I already changed permissions to 0600 (aka -rw---)
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
rjohansen@rjohansen-Satellite-L305:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.10
Release:10.10
rjohansen@rjohansen-Satellite-L305:~$ apt-cache policy pkgname
N: Unable to locate package pkgname
** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance:
Re: Question #150625
Trying to add sharing to directory and errors out: Could not apply changes!
Fix broken packages first.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743883
With what little knowledge of Linux that I have I'd say you are correct
because when the new sensors appear they do so with default colors as
opposed to the customized ones which are checked off in the box to run.
So does that mean it must be reported as a libsensors bug?
--
You received this
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tftp-hpa
I was upgranding from ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Mar 27 19:46:45 2011
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage:
ErrorMessage: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado
de saída
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743920
Title:
package tftpd-hpa 0.49-1 failed to install/upgrade:
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
I also tested a patched libgcrypt11 package according to comment #73. I
can now su from a local user to a non-local user and have a non-local
user use sudo (sudo-ldap).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in
Hi Wes, thanks a ton for your work here!
* You seem to have configure checked in to the hg repo, since it's
generated it shouldn't be (and it's not in mozilla-central)
Actually I'm getting a build error on RHEL6 I need to debug before I do
further checking.
--
You received this bug
Colin -- I checked in configure in purpose - it's part of the source
tarball (which is what that repo tracks). The idea is to eliminate
autoconf-2.13 as a dependency for projects embedding SpiderMonkey and
building from (or incorporating) the source tarball.
--
You received this bug
A couple more things:
* The js-config script will conflict. Not quite sure what to do with it; most
distros ship pkg-config, which is really better in all conceivable ways.
* Speaking of pkg-config, this does *not* ship a .pc file (it lives in
mozilla-central/xulrunner/installer). Would you
(In reply to comment #21)
Would you take a patch to add one, say
spidermonkey-185.pc?
Can you add this to the tracemonkey repo too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
(In reply to comment #20)
Colin -- I checked in configure in purpose - it's part of the source tarball
(which is what that repo tracks). The idea is to eliminate autoconf-2.13 as a
dependency for projects embedding SpiderMonkey and building from (or
incorporating) the source tarball.
Normal
I've actually packaged this in Ubuntu now, but I hit a couple of
unexpected issues:
1) js-config --libs doesn't return the right linker flags (-lmozjs)
2) Even though it builds an ABI versioned so, the soname of the
resulting ELF binary is still unversioned (ie, libmozjs185.so rather
than
Created attachment 521592
Fix js-config --libs
This makes js-config --libs return the right linker flags
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to
Created attachment 521593
Fix SONAME
This ensures that the resulting binary has the right soname
(libmozjs185.so.1.0). tbh, I couldn't figure out a better way of doing
this, so I'm not sure if anyone else has any better ideas
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
If you're doing official releases, you also want to address bug 554088
at some point.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop
(In reply to comment #26)
Created attachment 521593 [details]
Fix SONAME
This ensures that the resulting binary has the right soname
(libmozjs185.so.1.0). tbh, I couldn't figure out a better way of doing this,
so
I'm not sure if anyone else has any better ideas
Why does it need to be
Chris -- argh, thanks for catching the js-config bug. I'll be cutting a
new release to address that specific issue RSN.
Thanks also for your SONAME patch: that's something I don't have a lot
of experience with.
Mike -- I named the library libmozjs185.so rather than libmozjs.so
specifically
(Apologies if this is bikeshedding or a repeat of previous discussion)
(In reply to comment #29)
Mike -- I named the library libmozjs185.so rather than libmozjs.so
specifically
because it doesn't work as a drop-in for any previously-released libmozjs.so
(not even close -- see the release
Created attachment 521641
add pkg-config file
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
--
(In reply to comment #30)
Since we're deliberately changing the name, maybe libspidermonkey is a better
name? I agree that putting 185 in the name isn't good. When we change to
1.9.0,
would we have to change the SO name? That can't be right.
I don't think it matters a lot, honestly. I
(In reply to comment #31)
Created attachment 521641 [details]
add pkg-config file
We probably don't care, but you can make the pkg-config file
relative/relocatable by using the ${pcfiledir} expansion: see
https://github.com/Flusspferd/flusspferd/blob/master/libflusspferd/flusspferd.pc.in
(@
I believe that the 1.8.5 numbering scheme is a pretty bad one, and is only
there because of history. Perhaps we should change it; maybe to the Firefox
version number or the Gecko one.
So combining, you're proposing libspidermonkey-4.so ?
As someone else mentioned, there is also the
(In reply to comment #30)
(Apologies if this is bikeshedding or a repeat of previous discussion)
(Well-aimed kick to the shins)
I don't think anything has changed since comment 5. See the last three
paragraphs there.
Since we're deliberately changing the name, maybe libspidermonkey is a
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: backuppc
backuppc has been showing up as an error for a couple of days now,
particularly during downloads/installs.
However, I do not know what this program is supposed to do---it is
submitted for correction.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744006
Title:
package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cloud-init
My Setup
--
I am using the official Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meekat EBS AMIs
(ami-ccf405a5,ami-cef405a7) on
64bit t1.micro and
32bit m1.small
instances.
Both instances have: cloud-init v 0.5.15-0ubuntu3
Nothing additional
45 matches
Mail list logo
