[Bug 1076489] Re: Cannot be uninstalled without installing Apache2

2012-11-10 Thread Uqbar
PHP5 can be used without any web related stuff. So there is no need to pull web stuff when PHP5 is installed. On the other side, php5-cgi does need web stuff as CGI a web technology. Your suggestion proved to be good, though. ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed --

[Bug 1076489] Re: Cannot be uninstalled without installing Apache2

2012-11-10 Thread Uqbar
I moved the status to confirmed for the considerations in the above comment #4. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076489 Title: Cannot be uninstalled without installing

[Bug 1076489] Re: Cannot be uninstalled without installing Apache2

2012-11-10 Thread Robie Basak
I don't see any issue with the current php5 dependency structure, so you need to explain what you mean in detail. Please could you explain exactly what the problem is, and how you think the dependency structure should be changed? ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

[Bug 1076489] Re: Cannot be uninstalled without installing Apache2

2012-11-10 Thread Uqbar
I'm sorry I cannot say which dependencies I'd like to have: I have no idea. All I can tell you is that among php5 dependencies I see: libapache2-mod-php5 (= 5.4.6-1ubuntu1) | libapache2-mod-php5filter (= 5.4.6-1ubuntu1) | php5-cgi (= 5.4.6-1ubuntu1) | php5-fpm (= 5.4.6-1ubuntu1), If

[Bug 1076489] Re: Cannot be uninstalled without installing Apache2

2012-11-10 Thread Ondřej Surý
You seem to mix PHP 5 (as in the interpreter) and php5 meta-package. It would be nice to at least read the description of the packages you are reporting bugs to: --cut here-- Description: server-side, HTML-embedded scripting language (metapackage) This package is a metapackage that, when

[Bug 1076489] Re: Cannot be uninstalled without installing Apache2

2012-11-10 Thread Uqbar
You are very likely right. I tried to test a web application which needed a number of php5 stuff to be pulled. Once I decided the tests were over, I tried to uninstall those packages. The end situation was the one I described. php5-cgi says: Description-en: server-side, HTML-embedded scripting

[Bug 1077434] [NEW] Apache 2.2.14 Server Status no longer available

2012-11-10 Thread Richard de Rivaz
Public bug reported: Having upgraded Apache today to 2.2.14 the server status request (http://127.0.0.1/server-status) now produces the following error: Bad Request Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand. Reason: You're speaking plain HTTP to an SSL-enabled server

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2012-11-10 Thread Vladimir Kulev
As well as apache2-mpm-prefork ** Also affects: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008385 Title:

[Bug 1077483] [NEW] automount.8: Macro .RE without .RS; some spelling corrections to the manual

2012-11-10 Thread Bjarnig Ingi Gislason
Public bug reported: Software: autofs5 Version: 5.0.4-3.1ubuntu5.1 File: automount.8 Patch: Yes Warnings from GROFF_ENCODING=utf8 groff -b -ww -mandoc -z ... groff: automount.8: /usr/share/groff/1.20.1/tmac/an-old.tmac:592: backtrace: macro `RE' groff: automount.8:102: warning: number

[Bug 1077483]

2012-11-10 Thread Ubuntu Foundation's Bug Bot
The attachment automount.8.diff of this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag 'patch'

[Blueprint servercloud-r-openstack-packaging] Openstack packaging

2012-11-10 Thread Chuck Short
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short: Work items set to: Work items: Move packaging to the master branches: TODO Automate cloud archive branches: TODO Design process workflow for openstack packaging branches: TODO Write up process workflow for openstack packaging branches: TODO -- Openstack

[Blueprint servercloud-r-openstack-packaging] Openstack packaging

2012-11-10 Thread Chuck Short
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short: Definition Status: Discussion = Review -- Openstack packaging https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-r-openstack-packaging -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

[Blueprint servercloud-r-openstack-grizzly] Openstack next steps

2012-11-10 Thread Chuck Short
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short: Definition Status: Discussion = Review -- Openstack next steps https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-r-openstack-grizzly -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

[Bug 1076811] Re: Cloud-init modules do not reflect loaded config

2012-11-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:cloud-init -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076811 Title: Cloud-init modules do not reflect loaded config To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1070322] [NEW] again creation of quantum db

2012-11-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug: If there is some corruption in db , and need to create the db again , so restarting only the quantum service does'nt work , as it does'nt reads the db information from plugins file , need to define the config file explictily quantum-server --config-