[Bug 1557607] Re: Xenial container fails to start

2016-03-19 Thread Andrea Bernabei
I tried again, the container is now running...could it be because I got the fix from pam_lxcfs ? ii liblxc1 2.0.0~rc10-0ubuntu2 amd64Linux Containers userspace tools (library) rc lxc

[Bug 1557607] Re: Xenial container fails to start

2016-03-16 Thread Andrea Bernabei
~$ pwd=/sys/fs/cgroup/systemd/`awk -F: '/systemd/ { print $3 }' /proc/self/cgroup` ~$ echo $pwd /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd//user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-3.scope ~$ ls -ld $pwd drwxr-xr-x 2 design design 0 Mar 16 09:29 /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd//user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-3.scope ** Chang

[Bug 1557607] [NEW] Xenial container fails to start

2016-03-15 Thread Andrea Bernabei
Public bug reported: Environment: Xenial Xurus, 16.04, latest updates as of 14th March 2016, plus a bunch of additional silos/ppas that I can provide on request (this is the laptop used by the whole team so I wouldn't be surprised if this bug is the result of conflicting packages). LXC packag

[Bug 1211110] Re: network manager openvpn dns push data not updating system DNS addresses

2016-01-14 Thread Andrea Lazzarotto (Lazza)
Tristan, how is that a leak? Connections to 8.8.8.8 will go through the VPN, not outside of it. By the way, the problem remaining is that sometimes NM seems to still use the DNS of the router as well. It's as if without VPN you have say 192.168.0.1 as primary DNS, but with VPN you get these DNS ser

[Bug 1211110] Re: network manager openvpn dns push data not updating system DNS addresses

2016-01-08 Thread Andrea Lazzarotto (Lazza)
A simple workaround is to edit your VPN connection (via NM) and set up static DNS, for example using Google servers: 8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4 This way, the DNS request is sent through an external IP, hence it is routed using the VPN. If you were using the default DNS from your router (probably an interna

[Bug 1413293] Re: Unable to start instances, empty /etc/machine-id file.

2015-08-17 Thread Andrea Rosa
The patch has been merged in the nova code. Please note that the patch implements the logic suggested in the comment #3: if the file is present but empty nova will consider it as a missing file, then it raises an exception. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 1413293] Re: Unable to start instances, empty /etc/machine-id file.

2015-07-16 Thread Andrea Rosa
I submitted a patch to nova to fix this issue: https://review.openstack.org/202640 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413293 Title: Unable to start instances, empty /etc/m

[Bug 1449975] Re: Security bugs are never fixed in the tomcat packages

2015-04-30 Thread Andrea Dell'Amico
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2014-0099 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2014-0096 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2014-0075 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2014-0

[Bug 1449975] [NEW] Security bugs are never fixed in the tomcat packages

2015-04-29 Thread Andrea Dell'Amico
Public bug reported: Some security vulnerabilities have been fixed after the release of tomcat 7.0.52 that is packaged for Trusty: http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html None of them have been backported. I see the same behaviour with older distributions, too. Is there a chance to have the se

[Bug 1449951] [NEW] tomcat7 in ubuntu trusty is affected by the '50 days timeout bug' when run by the Oracle JDK 7

2015-04-29 Thread Andrea Dell'Amico
Public bug reported: After 2^32 milliseconds from the startup, tomcat fails with the following error: ERROR [core.StandardServer] - StandardServer.await: accept: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Accept timed out at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method) at java.net.

[Bug 1444944] [NEW] package nut-client 2.7.1-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-04-16 Thread Andrea
Public bug reported: This message always appears when I update the system ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: nut-client 2.7.1-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-34.45-generic 3.16.7-ckt8 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-34-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVers

[Bug 1372098] [NEW] package sa-compile 3.4.0-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 28

2014-09-21 Thread Andrea Pistoia
Public bug reported: I don't know what to add ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: sa-compile 3.4.0-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-36.63-generic 3.13.11.6 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-36-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.4 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Sep 18 15

[Bug 1244635] Re: setuid executables in a container may compromise security on the host

2013-10-30 Thread Andrea Corbellini
Waiting for the SRU to land in Saucy. Has it been delayed for some reason or has it been forgotten? :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244635 Title: setuid executables

[Bug 1244635] Re: setuid executables in a container may compromise security on the host

2013-10-26 Thread Andrea Corbellini
Good news. However I must say that the documentation on LXC does not say that libvirt is less secure than the official LXC: https://help.ubuntu.com/13.10/serverguide/lxc.html#lxc-libvirt So either libvirt should ship with an Apparmor profile for LXC, or a warning should be added to the relevant p

[Bug 1244635] Re: setuid executables in a container may compromise security on the host

2013-10-26 Thread Andrea Corbellini
Hi Stéphane, I can see at least three ways of escaping. The first is using LXC through libvirt. I see that there's an Apparmor profile for usr.bin.lxc-start, but AFAIK libvirt does not use lxc-start. Also, libvirt does not load the "lxc-containers" profile (AFAIK). This is proven by the fact tha

[Bug 1244635] Re: setuid executables in a container may compromise security on the host

2013-10-26 Thread Andrea Corbellini
> I also don't feel that this is a high priority bug since, so far, we do not recommend allowing unprivileged users to use containers. Agreed. Especially because (currently) it's fairly easy to escape from LXC when you have root access to the container. > I don't believe it would be a serious los

[Bug 1244635] [NEW] setuid executables in a container may compromise security on the host

2013-10-25 Thread Andrea Corbellini
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: If I execute "/var/lib/lxc/NAME/rootfs/usr/bin/sudo -i" on the host system, it works exactly like "/usr/bin/sudo -i". Now suppose that a user that has root access to the LXC container creates a flawed setuid executable. W

[Bug 1109029] Re: Depend on linux-initramfs-tools

2013-02-03 Thread Andrea Corbellini
** Description changed: Many core packages depend on initramfs-tools when they should actually depend on linux-initramfs-tools (virtual package provided by initramfs- tools and dracut). Debian seems to be using "Depends: initramfs-tools | linux-initramfs- tools" for almost every relev

[Bug 1109029] Re: Depend on linux-initramfs-tools

2013-01-29 Thread Andrea Corbellini
Marking as high as this bug makes dracut impossible to install. ** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1109029] Re: Depend on linux-initramfs-tools

2013-01-29 Thread Andrea Corbellini
** Also affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: console-setup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance

[Bug 1076286] Re: Puppet agent not correcly configuring facts synch'd from master

2012-11-16 Thread Andrea Biancini
Hi Matthaus, I just re-executed the operations described. I work with master and agent on two different machines. On the agent machine the /etc/puppet/puppet.conf is as follows: << [main] logdir=/var/log/puppet vardir=/var/lib/puppet ssldir=/var/lib/puppet/ssl rundir=/var/run/puppet factpath=$vard

[Bug 1076286] Re: Puppet agent not correcly configuring facts synch'd from master

2012-11-15 Thread Andrea Biancini
On my linux box the fact is synched on the agent (with pluginsync=true attribute) and the fact file is created in the folder /var/lib/puppet/lib/facter (and not in /etc/puppet/modules/modulewithfact/lib/facter/test_fact.rb as by your example). At this point the puppet daemon is not able to find th

[Bug 1076286] Re: Puppet agent not correcly configuring facts synch'd from master

2012-11-14 Thread Andrea Biancini
Robie, I tested it on Debian wheezy and the situation is exactly the same. I will try and track the problem to signal it at the more appropriate level. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1076286] Re: Puppet agent not correcly configuring facts synch'd from master

2012-11-13 Thread Andrea Biancini
Robie, yes the problem is exactly the one you described. The puppet daemon does not source /var/lib/puppet/lib/facter for facts and my proposed modification is a workaround to have it properly running. Also the command "puppet agent --test" does not source the facts in /var/lib/puppet/lib/facter

[Bug 1076286] Re: Puppet agent not correcly configuring facts synch'd from master

2012-11-08 Thread Andrea Biancini
Hi, yes I know it is not needed to have a manifest file to propagate the fact to the node. In fact the facter gets propagated and is available on the node machine, however whey I try to recall it from a manifest, the fact simply is not evaluated. I try to better describe the problem by answerin

[Bug 1076286] [NEW] Puppet agent not correcly configuring facts synch'd from master

2012-11-08 Thread Andrea Biancini
efatult/puppet file in the puppet package from further versions. I hope my example and explaination is clear enough. Thanks and regards, Andrea ** Affects: puppet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 1057772] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 127

2012-11-02 Thread Andrea
I can't verify it anymore since i upgraded from 12.04 to 12.10, marked as invalid ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 1057772] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 127

2012-09-27 Thread Andrea
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057772 Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script post-removal ha restituito lo

[Bug 1057772] [NEW] package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 127

2012-09-27 Thread Andrea
Public bug reported: installing samba server in ubuntu 12.04(.1) it's impossible, dpkg says it fails to cnfigure every time the apt daemon is invoked ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24 Uname: L

[Bug 830084] Re: fsdev is not supported by this qemu build

2012-04-27 Thread Andrea Baita
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 782973 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782973 I don't think that the bug is duplicated, I had the same problem with the fresh 12.4. qemu-kvm 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu13. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, whi

[Bug 830084] Re: fsdev is not supported by this qemu build

2012-04-27 Thread Andrea Baita
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 782973 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782973 ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu. http

[Bug 830084] Re: fsdev is not supported by this qemu build

2011-09-04 Thread Andrea Corbellini
=> Confirmed ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-2 => None ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andrea Corbellini (andrea.corbellini) => (unassigned) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 782973 virtfs isn't enabled -- You received this bug notifi

[Bug 830084] Re: fsdev is not supported by this qemu build

2011-08-24 Thread Andrea Corbellini
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrea Corbellini (andrea.corbellini) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830084 Title: fsdev is not supported by this qemu build To manage notifica

[Bug 830084] [NEW] fsdev is not supported by this qemu build

2011-08-20 Thread Andrea Corbellini
=/home/andrea/.../: there is no option group "fsdev" fsdev is not supported by this qemu build. Reading http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.libvirt/40462 it seems that kvm should Build-Depend on libattr1-dev. ** Affects: kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided S

[Bug 804636] Re: package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-07-01 Thread Andrea Bodo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804636 Title: package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-ins

[Bug 804636] [NEW] package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-07-01 Thread Andrea Bodo
Public bug reported: don't know why ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-generic 2.6.38.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic i686 AptOrdering: abuse-frabs: Install abuse: Install amavisd-new-postfix

[Bug 800833] Re: package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-06-22 Thread Andrea Bodo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800833 Title: package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-ins

[Bug 800833] [NEW] package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-06-22 Thread Andrea Bodo
Public bug reported: removing Qbittorrent but i had some problems downloading new packages ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.44-generic 2.6.38.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic i686 AptOrdering: q

[Bug 701765] Re: open_basedir breaks by restricting paths to files that should be allowed; Unknown: Failed opening required '/usr/share/phpmyadmin/index.php' (include_path='.') in Unknown on line 0

2011-01-20 Thread Andrea Azzini
OK, then this bug is fixed, on Ubuntu's side. Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701765 Title: open_basedir breaks by restricting paths to files that should be

[Bug 701765] Re: open_basedir breaks by restricting paths to files that should be allowed; Unknown: Failed opening required '/usr/share/phpmyadmin/index.php' (include_path='.') in Unknown on line 0

2011-01-17 Thread Andrea Azzini
Sorry for bumping so impolitely, but this is grave and still not completely solved, at least in Hardy. @James Thanks for pointing this out. I am kind of surprised that it works without the /etc/ path but i am fixing it now anyway. @others Can anyone at least confirm that this is *not* an issue a

[Bug 701765] Re: open_basedir breaks by restricting paths to files that should be allowed; Unknown: Failed opening required '/usr/share/phpmyadmin/index.php' (include_path='.') in Unknown on line 0

2011-01-14 Thread Andrea Azzini
Uhm. The open_basedir has /var/lib/php which is a valid prefix for /var/lib/phpmyadmin/, and it has always (for two years until wednesday when this bug appeared) worked with this open_basedir string. To further clarify: [...]:/usr/share/phpmyadmin/:/var/lib/phpmyadmin/:[...] works [...]:/usr/shar

[Bug 701765] Re: open_basedir breaks by restricting paths to files that should be allowed; Unknown: Failed opening required '/usr/share/phpmyadmin/index.php' (include_path='.') in Unknown on line 0

2011-01-14 Thread Andrea Azzini
I am not completely confident that the bug is indeed fixed. The original problem is gone, but I think I see a similar issue in the updated package. On my Hardy server, paths *without* a trailing slash now seem to be blocked unexpectedly. [Fri Jan 14 15:48:37 2011] [error] [client 193.205.80.47] P

[Bug 668043] Re: libvirt default network doesn't start, iptables errors, bad rules

2010-10-30 Thread Andrea Guerini
I have the same error after install KVM and use virtual-manager. I try to add some iptables rules but nothing change. We wait somebody help us to resolve this problem thanks andrea -- libvirt default network doesn't start, iptables errors, bad rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66804

[Bug 651182] Re: Invocations of "/etc/init.d/mailman start" spawns multiple instances

2010-10-02 Thread Andrea Gelmini
mailmanctl will still exit, but if no matching process is found, mailmanctl will remove the apparently stale lock and make another attempt to claim the master lock. Thanks a lot for your work, Andrea ** Patch added: "Avoid buggy '-s' implementation" https:

[Bug 651182] Re: Invocations of "/etc/init.d/mailman start" spawns multiple instances

2010-09-30 Thread Andrea Gelmini
Hi all, and thanks a lot for your work. Yesterday I filled same bug for Debian (same evidence on Testing): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598509 Ciao, Andrea ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #598509 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598509

[Bug 651182] Re: Invocations of "/etc/init.d/mailman start" spawns multiple instances

2010-09-29 Thread Andrea Gelmini
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651182/+attachment/1653547/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Invocations of "/etc/init.d/mailman start" spawns multiple instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651182 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 651182] [NEW] Invocations of "/etc/init.d/mailman start" spawns multiple instances

2010-09-29 Thread Andrea Gelmini
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mailman r...@vaio:/tmp# ps -u list PID TTY TIME CMD 8490 ?00:00:00 mailmanctl 8491 ?00:00:00 python 8492 ?00:00:00 python 8493 ?00:00:00 python 8494 ?00:00:00 python 8495 ?00:00:00 python

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile()

2010-09-16 Thread Andrea Corbellini
Hi. Sorry but currently I'm not able to provide my domain.xml (however will do as soon as I find the time). But I would like to say that I'm not using eucalyptus and all my VMs work fine without apparmor. -- Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile() htt

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile()

2010-09-07 Thread Andrea Corbellini
Oops, sorry! I ran "virsh capabilities" after disabling apparmor. So, to clarify: with AppArmor, every attempt to use a virtual machine fails; without it, everything works perfectly. ** Attachment added: "virsh-capabilities-with-apparmor" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyp

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile()

2010-09-07 Thread Andrea Corbellini
Hi Jamie and thank you for your feedback. Here are the answers to your questions: 1. my capabilities are in the attachment; 2. there are no lines containing DENIED in my logs; 3. restarting libvirt without disabling AppArmor produces no effects. ** Attachment added: "virsh-capabilities" https

[Bug 628055] Re: Instances don't start correctly: Security Labeling error running aa_change_profile()

2010-09-05 Thread Andrea Corbellini
I see this bug too, but I don't think the problem is in eucalyptus: I'm using qemu+kvm+libvirt. Whenever I try to start any of my virtual machines (that just some days ago in Lucid worked fine) I get this error: # virsh -c qemu:///system start abc error: Failed to start domain abc error: internal

[Bug 616257] Re: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-08-11 Thread Andrea Bonarini
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53472419/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53472421/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Df.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53472423/Df.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 616257] [NEW] package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-08-11 Thread Andrea Bonarini
Public bug reported: Error occurred in standard upgrade suggested by package manager. The installation is standard with no special tricks. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.39-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: L

[Bug 458514] Re: mysql-server-5.1 starts before filesystem is mounted (karmic)

2010-05-29 Thread Andrea Torre
Upgraded to Lucid two weeks ago. Everything runs smooth since then. Regards Andrea dpkg -l | grep mysql -- ii libdbd-mysql-perl4.012-1ubuntu1 A Perl5 database interface to the MySQL data ii libmysqlclient15off

[Bug 571933] Re: dhclient3 hangs on shutdown

2010-05-07 Thread Andrea Ratto
Alright then mine is a different problem. However in the event of a reboot the dhcp client is not supposed to release the address, since it is going to ask one again in a minute. -- dhclient3 hangs on shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571933 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 571933] Re: dhclient3 hangs on shutdown

2010-05-07 Thread Andrea Ratto
It seems that the DHCP server does not reply to DHCPRELEASE so dhclient waits until timeout. My DSL modem does the same. My workaround is to remove /etc/rc0.d/S35networking and /etc/rc6.d/S35networking, but I would like to know if there is a way to configure dhclient to ignore release requests,

[Bug 458514] Re: mysql-server-5.1 starts before filesystem is mounted (karmic)

2010-04-16 Thread Andrea Torre
Sorry for having not replied earlier. I haven't tried Lucid yet. However I had to reinstall Karmic a couple of months ago and since then the issue has appeared only once, even though the pc is booted daily. Regards Andrea -- mysql-server-5.1 starts before filesystem is mounted (karmic)

[Bug 458514] Re: mysql-server-5.1 starts before filesystem is mounted (karmic)

2009-12-30 Thread Andrea Torre
Weird as it sounds, I got around the issue moving up the relevant entry in fstab (/dev/sda7), and positioning it just between / and swap mounting. I must warn, however, that mysqld seldom does not start anyway and I cannot isolate the cause for such a random behaviour. Hope this helps. fstab

[Bug 449814] Re: winbind not installable

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
coreutils 6.10-6ubuntu1 [modified: bin/chmod] you are using a broken chmod. Marking this bug as invalid cause the bug is not there as the package installs fine on jaunty. -- winbind not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449814 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 449814] Re: winbind not installable

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
coreutils 6.10-6ubuntu1 [modified: bin/chmod] you are using a broken chmod. Marking this bug as invalid cause the bug is not there as the package installs fine on jaunty. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- winbind not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 449814] Re: winbind uninstallable

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
** Summary changed: - amule + winbind uninstallable ** Summary changed: - winbind uninstallable + winbind not installable -- winbind not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 449814] Re: amule

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
latest windbind package version is 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5, (and you are installing 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.2) would you mind giving an apt-get update and try again? ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- amule https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449814 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 449814] Re: amule

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
changing package from amule to winbind. ** Package changed: amule (Ubuntu) => samba (Ubuntu) -- amule https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 60213] Re: snmpd dosen't purge non persistent interfaces

2009-02-09 Thread Andrea Corbellini
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium Status: New => Confirmed -- snmpd dosen't purge non persistent interfaces https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/60213 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-