Thanks for the approvals, Sebastian and Brian.
I've repeated the steps I outlined in the description and confirmed that
the bug does not occur with the packages in -proposed. I've also
installed the packages in our production nagios server and confirmed
that things seem to more or less work as exp
** Description changed:
- Description: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS
- Release: 12.04
+ [Impact]
+ Under nagios 3.2.3 with state retention enabled, any host aliases or display
names assigned to a host would be persisted into the retention file, and would
supersede subsequent configuration changes. As
** Also affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
I'm going to go ahead and unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors from this bug -
branch merge requests are automatically added to the sponsorship queue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
You could potentially work around the regex misinterpretation issue by
using some more complex combinations of grep and awk and so forth, but
there's a better reason to not use getent | grep.
If /etc/nsswitch.conf is configured with a user or group database that
doesn't support enumerating users (
** Branch linked: lp:~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/maverick/multipath-tools/fix-
crash-on-shutdown
--
multipathd segfault
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-
The broken code was moved into a different file in Lucid, and the
mistyped mask was fixed as well.
This problem only affects Karmic, and only if you explicitly specify an
IP address, don't specify a netmask, and give an IP address whose first
octet is between 128 and 192 (non-inclusive)
** Change
It sounds like the secd you're using only supports single DES. Single
DES has been deprecated for over 10 years now as a cipher, due to its
very short key length. I would highly encourage you to upgrade your
infrastructure to a more secure encryption type.
If you simply must continue using your cu
Here's my last debdiff rebased on top of the recent security update.
I've also dispatched builds to my PPA
(https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu-tests), which should be
running shortly.
** Attachment added: "krb5_1.7dfsg~beta3-1ubuntu0.2.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3760263
I don't see how this is a bug. Debian and Ubuntu in general try to
enable as many features of software packages as they can, almost
everything has Kerberos authentication of some form or another as a
feature, and because of how libraries and Debian dependencies work,
anything that /supports/ Kerber
grexk: thanks for the patch. A few nits for future reference:
- LP closers are generally of the form (LP: #nn) - you didn't have the hash
- It looks like you added a superfluous line to set SRC_VERSION in debian/rules
- Your version number was appropriate for a PPA upload, but not for upload
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Evan Broder (broder)
--
should build kernel modules with dkms
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277556
You received this bug notification becau
net/36274990/krb5_1.7dfsg%7Ebeta3-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) => (unassigned)
--
Strange behavior of libkrb5 since karmic ...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489418
You
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed to
delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341432
You received this bug notification because y
I think the patch is a little extensive to be directly uploaded as a
Karmic SRU, but I'll look at pulling a SRU patch together for just the
bugfixes.
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) =>
This shouldn't be a problem. We're still in sync phase for Ubuntu
Lucid, so the new krb5 package will get automatically pulled in when
it hits Debian testing.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I released 1.7+dfsg-3 to Debian unstable. That includes a fix to this
> bug. I'd r
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 462059 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462059
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 462059
libkrb53 package required instead of libkrb5-3 in Karmic
--
root-system-rootd has missing dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477315
You rece
This is a bug in the packages that still depend on libkrb53, not krb5
itself. root-system is one of only two that still have this problem.
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
missing binary transition package libkrb53
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464426
You received
Hmm...apparently not - I would have expected the package to fail to
install, but it seems to just provide a useless configuration. Oh well -
this can wait until Lucid.
** Changed in: kerberos-configs (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
FFe: Sync kerberos-configs 2.2 (main) from Debi
Public bug reported:
Please sync kerberos-configs 2.2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
kerberos-configs currently includes the krb4-config package in
Ubuntu. Since Karmic contains krb5 version 1.7, which doesn't come
with krb4, it doesn't make sense to i
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: open-iscsi
The recent open-iscsi update changed from always running `iscsiadm -m
node --loginall=automatic` to only running it if `cat
/etc/iscsi/nodes/*/*/default 2>/dev/null| grep -c automatic` is not
equal to `iscsiadm -m session 2>/dev/null | grep -c
Oh wait...I'm supposed to un-assign it to myself? *sigh* So confusing :)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Evan Broder (broder)
** Package changed: ubuntu => krb5 (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
22 matches
Mail list logo