[Bug 589611] Re: [SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-09-28 Thread Joe McDonagh
Awesome, I thought I had fixed it previously but have noticed it's still happening and causing some failed puppet runs. -- [SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-07-29 Thread Joe McDonagh
Just to chime in, this is affecting my 10.04 LTS nodes talking to my recently upgraded 10.04 LTS puppet master. Puppet sits behind Apache with mod_proxy_balancer and mod_ssl. I disabled reqtimeout and have yet to see this re-appear. -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 se

[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2010-01-25 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck, you're thinking this is that Debian bug that had an advisory last week right? -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Tea

Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-11-25 Thread Joe McDonagh
#x27;s quieted down for me, thanks for your attention to the issue. -- Joe McDonagh Operations Engineer Silent Penguin Services AIM: YoosingYoonickz IRC: joe-mac on freenode www.colonfail.com -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://

Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-10-25 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck Short wrote: > @Joe: > > Its marked Low so our qa scripts pick it up. Ill take a look at this > again after karmic has been released. > > Regards > chuck > > Ah, ok, cool. Thanks Chuck. -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://b

Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-10-07 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck Short wrote: > ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided => Low > > Chuck, was wondering, should this be marked Low from Undecided if it hasn't been confirmed nor denied by anyone? -- Joe McDonagh Operations Engineer www.colonfail.com -- Slow

[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-28 Thread Joe McDonagh
Stefan, thanks for re-iterating the MaxRequestsPerChild tidbit, I had forgotten that option was for lifetime, not concurrency. That'll probably help workaround momentarily. Also, I am not currently doing any tweaking wrt the SSLSessionCache, I recall messing with it when I first started seeing thi

Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-24 Thread Joe McDonagh
es the package information I put in the beginning look right? -- Joe McDonagh Operations Engineer www.colonfail.com -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-23 Thread Joe McDonagh
This took down a box today, had to visit the DC for it... is there any more information-gathering I can do for you or myself here? -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification

[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-20 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck, is there anything else you need from me to promote this from incomplete? -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, wh

[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-09 Thread Joe McDonagh
Sorry forgot to attach the output of AB after I killed it: ab -n 200 -c 100 -f TLS11 https://scan-stag.osdc/ This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $> Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.ap

[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-09 Thread Joe McDonagh
Hey Chuck, thanks for the response. The command is: ab -n 200 -c 100 -f TLS11 https://webserver/ At ten seconds: 30253 www-data 20 0 254m 75m 4432 S 31 0.5 0:03.50 apache2 30252 www-data 20 0 251m 72m 4464 S 30 0.4 0:03.34 apache2 30250 www-data 2

[Bug 422138] [NEW] Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-08-31 Thread Joe McDonagh
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 1. Ubuntu Release Info: Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS Release:8.04 2. Package Information: apache2-mpm-prefork: Installed: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11 Candidate: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11 Version table: *** 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11 0 500 http