On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 12:47:05PM -, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> you're right that the double check is too much, and only due to legacy and
> not enough time to make 100 % clean things (that's really a minor point).
Actually, what I question is whether the content check is worth doing.
But perhap
> the solution Martin has proposed can only be considered as a temporary local
> fix (ie on your boxes but not for an upload) for affected users, for the
> reason I mentioned in the Debian bug linked.
Not disagreeing, but frankly I can't see any very great value in the
additional check of the flag
I've confirmed that this problem exists in Ibex, not that I really had
any doubts. It's been reported to Debian as well, and the maintainer is
pondering the best way to repair this for Lenny. I got the impression
that this is still in the upstream codebase, so it is to be expected
that Jaunty and
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nut
It's barely possible that Ubuntu isn't vulnerable to this - I discovered
it, and did the actual smoke tests, on a Debian Lenny machine. The
problem is that the nut init script's powerdown function relies on
calling upsmon -K at a very late point, and
Is this ever going to be fixed for the stable release? The repetitive
error mesasges about /proc/*/net/if_net6 came to my attention while
looking for something else, which led me to this bug. It seems to have
been first reported for a version that's still in Ibex, though there's a
bumped version
