[Bug 535029] Re: Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1

2010-03-22 Thread Matthew Weaver
(Sorry for the double-post, just want threads of record like this to be accurate) Turns out revocation *is* supported, it's clearly in the release notes: http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-5.4 -- Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 535029] Re: Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1

2010-03-22 Thread Matthew Weaver
Thanks for the attention, Colin. I can only imagine how busy you are right now. I'm very happy to hear the commitment to maintain a backport. Damien Miller has a pretty excellent track record, separate from OpenSSH's overall chain of successes (or lack thereof), but even so I can deeply understan

[Bug 535029] Re: Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1

2010-03-17 Thread Matthew Weaver
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson) -- Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-

[Bug 535029] Re: Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1

2010-03-17 Thread Matthew Weaver
Colin, what can be done to convince folks that inclusion of this OpenSSH release in lucid is the best idea? The certificate authentication support is most compelling for large institutional installations, the same user base that focuses on LTS releases (and have long upgrade cycles). Missing it i