By the way: What means Changed in gtk: status: Unknown → Fix Released ??
As I understand it, it means that Gnome have now included a patch in their
development version to be able to ask a username and password.
So Gnome will (the day your version of Ubuntu will include this new patch) ask
a
** Also affects: gtk via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384940
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
cups says can't promp for authorization when printing to my samba printer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283811
You received this bug notification because you are a
Just a note to keep in mind about bug #132791.
Also bug #283811 which I am more investigating.
--
SMB Backend Fails when printing to a Windows share
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73800
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Just a note about a similar bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132791
that seems more linked to finding wrong password in cache.
--
cups says can't promp for authorization when printing to my samba printer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283811
You received this bug notification because you
What does puzzle me more about Derg log, is not that Tree connect failed, it is
that it tried to connect with a user I did not expect, marie:
D [27/Apr/2009:08:52:45 -0400] cupsdIsAuthorized: requesting-user-name=marie
D [27/Apr/2009:08:52:45 -0400] cupsdProcessIPPRequest: 7 status_code=0
Thanks anders for that new piece of information.
Could you give the output of 'dpkg -l | grep samba' just to be sure that
you are running the patch version?
This seems to confirmed that the new version does fix Asynchronous I/O
result, but not the fact that setreSuid results in EAGAIN error.
Thanks Anders, I should have seen this Read more... link.
For me, this helps to know if samba logs have the following line:
setresuid failed with EAGAIN.
But the latest ppa1 version probably won't do that, you'd have to revert
to plain samba first.
And the Samba log are many files by default
We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't heard
back from you in a while.
Do you still have problems with this? Thanks.
--
Authentication fails in cups web admin module
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305014
You received this bug notification because you are a
Well, I don't really can test it either, so it would have to be tested
by others.
I don't really understand, how this race between AIO and setresuid would affect
the result of setresuid.
Seems it's fix the result of the (Asynchronous IO), not of setresuid.
But I have an even much bigger problem
Sigh. It is even a bit more complex than that:
In Unix-like systems, user-level activities are implemented by running
processes. Most Unix systems support a ``thread'' as a separate concept;
threads share memory inside a process, and the system scheduler actually
schedules threads. Linux does
Just copying info from someone having this problem with no result.
Taken from http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Fedora/2007-08/msg03497.html
I was upgrade our Linux Samba server (Fedora Core 4, kernel 2.6.17,
samba 3.0.23d) to Fedora 7, kernel 2.6.22.2-57.fc7, samba 3.0.25bb-2.fc7
(SELinux
This link suggest bug may have been introduced in samba 3.0.23:
http://lists.zerezo.com/samba/msg26421.html
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in
A relatively good description of the bug:
http://www.nabble.com/segfault-with-failed-to-set-uid-td16137340.html
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba
Just to remember it was reported in Debian as (closed because not
reproductible) bug #501773:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=501773
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I think I found:
o Andrew Tridgell
* Avoid a race condition in glibc between AIO and setresuid().
* Become root for AIO operations.
taken from the latest (3.0.34 samba changelog):
This would explain why
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/341816
say that Build the
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #510188
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510188
** Also affects: samba (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510188
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
Ok, I think this time I have found.
taken from 3.0.34 samba changelog (latest in 3.0):
http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.0.34.html
o Andrew Tridgell
* Avoid a race condition in glibc between AIO and setresuid().
* Become root for AIO operations.
This would explain why
In fact I believe it comes from that guy:
http://webui.sourcelabs.com/rhel/issues/459901
he seems to suggest that the real problem is with the kernel not exactly
implementing Posix correctly.
I still have a doubt because he speak of setresuid changing the value of AIO,
not changing the value
Yeah, I began to realise I was wrong before reading you comment.
I have a new, I hope better hypothesis now.
It look a bit stupid, but maybe it is trying to become a deleted user.
For ZDS (original poster) it would have means he would have deleted the
nobody user (normally nobody have
id 65534
For Berni, I meant:
sudo cat /etc/group | grep 1001 of course.
--
Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
Thank you for this bug report.
Many other similar bugs have been reported, some on Ubuntu, sometimes on
Fedora, or even in FreeBSD.
In Ubuntu I speak of bug #216358, bug #314657 and bug #229654.
Could you check if user ID 11789 really exist by doing:
sudo cat /etc/passwd | grep 11789
sudo cat
Thanks for this bug report.
As this was reported a long time ago, we would like to know: Is it still an
issue for you?
If so, could you give an exemple of acl permissions that generate this problem.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
An extra 'executable'
Still an issue in Jaunty.
Dépaquetage de samba (à partir de .../samba_2%3a3.3.1-1ubuntu1_i386.deb) ...
Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour « man-db »...
Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour « ufw »...
Paramétrage de samba (2:3.3.1-1ubuntu1) ...
Generating
Thanks you, for your comment.
Happy to see that you are there to answer more questions.
Then, looking the backtrace, I remark:
#2 0x00613c7b in smb_panic (why=value optimized out)
at lib/util.c:1639
#3 0x00618cf1 in assert_uid (ruid=4294967295, euid=10009)
at
BTW, I determined that user 0 is root, and -1 is used to say, do not change
this value (real user or effective user).
http://linux.die.net/man/2/setresuid
Now my very BIG GUESS is that it could be that the code in Samba use -1 without
a type cast to uid_t.
And that the code would be ok say, on
Seems in .orig of jaunty (lib/sec_util.c) the functions seems identical.
Oh well, seems there is enough info for at least let a developer verify my
hypothesis.
Confirming the bug.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
Well, at first glace it does seems my guess is right.
I have downloaded samba 3.0.28aorig.tar.gz (need to learn the command to
extract sources and apply ubuntu patches) and found this in util_sec.c:
void set_effective_gid(gid_t gid)
{
#if USE_SETRESUID
setresgid(-1,gid,-1);
#endif
#if
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Please include the information requested at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingSamba#samba-server.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
We are closing this bug report because it seems to be caused by a bad
configuration value rather than being a true bug, as described in the
previous comments. Please reopen it if you think it is wrong, and don't
hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report
you can click
We are closing this bug report as you requested in the previous comment.
Thanks again!
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
8.10 system-config-printer lost SMB connection selection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311961
You received this bug notification because you are
Thank you for giving the requested info.
Marking as Confirmed.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Copying from RISC OS to intrepid with Samba writes zeros ad infinitum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292130
You received this bug notification because you are
Seems complete enough for a developer to say, if it is true or not.
Confirming.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Winbind dont obey winbind use default domain = yes for getent group, wbinfo
-g work fine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336796
You received this bug
I now tend to think this is caused by the -1 not being casted to appropriate
type in:
setresgid(-1,gid,-1);
and in:
assert_uid(-1, uid);
in lib/sec_util.c as I said in bug #314657 causing problems on 64 bits machines.
But I am unsure.
--
Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 314657 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 314657
smbd segfault in assert_uid
--
Segfault in Samba
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264982
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Marking bug #264982 as a duplicate of this one, because it does hang on
assert_uid too, although from a totally different backtrace. Not sure if
it is really same cause, but since there is no answer on that bug, seems
a better end, than marking it invalid for no answer.
--
smbd segfault in
A closed (not because fixed) Debian bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468296
suggests that this could be linked with roaming profiles:
Problem resolved, the workstation is not using roaming profiles anymore.
Probably this was due to misconfigured (better: unconfigured) profile
Bug #314657 and bug #229654 seems to be duplicates.
Well, I would make them duplicates of this one, but, as it was marked invalid...
hum, in fact looks more like Steve thinks his explanation for invaliding is
doubtful.
Guess I'll mark those duplicate of this one, and change to Incomplete.
**
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468296 suggests it
could be linked to roaming profiles.
--
Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Clear enough for a developer to check and decide, so I Confirm this bug.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
winbind is not started before samba, but should
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Fixed upstream in 3.3.2 http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.3.2.html:
* Fix saving of files on Samba share using MS Office 2007 (bug #6160).
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6160
** Also affects: samba via
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6160
Importance: Unknown
40 matches
Mail list logo
