I my opinion this change is simple (but critical, any user can break the
service) and the patch should be applied for squid in the main
repository of Ubuntu LTS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
patch?
Best regards,
Stanislav
** Affects: squid3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: squid3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: squid (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
We have upgraded our server from 10.04 to 14.04 and now we have just the
same issue. To me more precise this does not work with VHOSTs.
Our server is using LDAP authentication provided by to domain
controllers which belong to different domains. Our scheme is:
AuthnProviderAlias ldap ldapdom1
in /var/spool/squid3/0B
Solution:
- swap creation process should not be daemonized, the patch is attached
Best regards,
Stanislav German-Evtushenko
** Affects: squid3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
not be daemonized, the patch is attached
Best regards,
Stanislav German-Evtushenko
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405351
Title:
First run: Failed to verify one
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1121526
Title:
False positives on trojans (Trojan.Agent-132354)
To
Public bug reported:
- Ubuntu 14.04
- nagios3 3.5.1-1ubuntu1
- check-mk-livestatus 1.2.2p3-1
Nagios goes down everyday at midnight with livestatus enabled and
downtime configured.
Here are bug reports in other trackers:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083003
This type of files should be also excluded but I'm not sure what would be the
best way to do:
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/dist-upgrader-all/current/precise.tar.gz
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty-updates/main/dist-upgrader-all/current/trusty.tar.gz
and
Public bug reported:
Everytime /usr/share/mdadm/checkarray RAID consistency check is being
executed (started on first sunday of a month by /etc/cron.d/mdadm) on
Ubuntu 12.04.4 KVM hypervisor, KVM guests running on the host
(Ubuntu/Debian/Scientific linux/Windows ) start to swap, freeze,
throwing
** Also affects: virtualbox
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292588
Title:
Removing qemu-kvm doesn't prevent kvm module
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bind9
error on installing updates
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Jun 5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793223
Title:
package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:
подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation
thanks. I will do more testing and open a bug at lucid-backports.
I was simply not very familiar with the ubuntu release process.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to rrdtool in ubuntu.
to have 1.3.9 in Lucid-updates.
thanks,
stanislav
** Affects: rrdtool (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
rrdtool1.3.8 in Lucid needs an update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683801
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
I tested this thing again on other system - looks like it works. Can't
imagine why I can't reproduce this again.
--
Setkey has no policy priority support compiled in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419150
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Public bug reported:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 9.04
Release:9.04
ipsec-tools:
Installed: 1:0.7-2.1ubuntu1.9.04.1
# setkey -f /etc/setkey.conf
line 3 Policy priority not compiled in at [ out prio 1000 none]
parse failed, line 3.
# cat /etc/setkey.conf
flush;
spdflush;
Dustin, Steve, thank you for your support.
I'll be waiting for the updates on my hardy, and pray to not get in a
situation where this bug will show up ugly on my servers.
I remain subscribed, as I believe guys will make their job done soon.
Good luck!
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 06:01 +, Dustin
Subscribing to what agent 8131 said.
Now there are two drinks to get for the guy who helps us!
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 07:13 +, agent 8131 wrote:
agent 8131
--
() Campania Panglicii în ASCII
/\ http://stas.nerd.ro/ascii/
--
cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
Can somebody explain, is this bug fixed in hardy packages?
A lot of comments, and not a single clear report!!!
If it is not fixed... Is there a patch for local script in initramfs-
tools and mdadm or is there any rebuilt package with the fixes?
Currently in Hardy i got:
~$ apt-cache policy
Can you point to a wiki page or a comment in this thread where I'll find
a solution for hardy?
Or I should install Intrepid packages?
Thank you.
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:14 +, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
This is fixed in Intrepid, not in Hardy.
:-Dustin
--
() Campania Panglicii în ASCII
Just post a file with patch which works for hardy, and that's all folks
:)
--
cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug.
--
:
On Thursday 09 October 2008, Stanislav Sushkov wrote:
Just post a file with patch which works for hardy, and that's all folks
:)
No it's not.
There is a procedure for that, so it will be updated automatically. That
procedure I followed but at some point in the procedure, powers
of 'normal
Dustin,
what about those packages for ibex. If I update my hardy with those, so
I risk serious troubles?
Or it is not possible cause of difference between kernels?
Someone did this before?
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 21:21 +, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
Dustin
--
() Campania Panglicii în ASCII
/\
23 matches
Mail list logo
