I can't really reproduced, don't have a similar setup ready. However, analyzing
the backtrace and the code, the following may fix the issue:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2fddfb0a95288d39cee2e82376297ce43296743b
It has already been pushed to the ceph stable branch, though it's not in
any ta
Note that while libapache2-mod-fastcgi is currently the better way to
go, there's also libapache2-mod-fcgid, or nginx/lighttpd with fastcgi.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libfcgi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
At the time we went through the entire code base. It didn't make sense going
just through the ceph code and not through the radosgw code, they reside on the
same tree and share code. Also, the radosgw code size is not as big as it was
implied at the time.
In any case, we audited that code again,
We fixed all the issues that were pointed out, and it was already ready for
precise. At the time it was communicated that the main issue for not including
radosgw was libfcgi, however, that doesn't appear to be an issue any more.
We've also created a test suite for radosgw (github.com/ceph/s3-tes
