Re: [Bug 456224] Re: Installing bind9 with forwarders causes loss of hostname resolution.

2009-10-29 Thread cwsupport
Mathias Gug wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 08:24:46AM -, cwsupport wrote: Resolv.conf did have two lines with nameserver entries for the two entries that were moved to Bind9. I can't reproduce this. Using a standard karmic system, installing the bind9 package does

[Bug 456224] Re: Installing bind9 with forwarders causes loss of hostname resolution.

2009-10-22 Thread cwsupport
Resolv.conf did have two lines with nameserver entries for the two entries that were moved to Bind9. This configuration WORKS under Hardy Heron and AFAIK intrepid. The problem is resolved via an entry in resolv.conf of 'nameserver 127.0.0.1'. Before this is discounted though how come DIG still

[Bug 456224] [NEW] Installing bind9 with forwarders causes loss of hostname resolution.

2009-10-20 Thread cwsupport
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 Ubuntu Karmic Koala 9.10 BETA FULLY updated via apt-get dist-upgrade bind9: 1:9.6.1.dfsg.P1-3 After bind9 is installed hostname resolution no longer occurs on programs such as ping. However dig resolves successfully via the local server. Bind9

[Bug 456224] Re: Installing bind9 with forwarders causes loss of hostname resolution.

2009-10-20 Thread cwsupport
Oops. I mean Hardy Heron 8.04. -- Installing bind9 with forwarders causes loss of hostname resolution. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2009-10-20 Thread cwsupport
This is *STILL* an issue in Karmic Koala 9.10 BETA. -- ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a bug

[Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2009-10-20 Thread cwsupport
NOTE: The patch works for Karmic Koala as well. -- ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a bug

[Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2008-11-03 Thread cwsupport
Here is a patch to /etc/init.d/ntp that will ensure that the NTP service comes up and the hwclock is re-sync'd even if the panic-threshold would normally stop ntpd from syncing. This may not be applicable to everyone but I believe it should be the default behaviour - maybe a switch could be

[Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2008-11-03 Thread cwsupport
oops. re: the last patch. I still believe that the option to set the date via ntpdate automatically should be based on options in /etc/default and that merely having the ntp package installed should not invoke functionality in a mandatory manner without being able to easily switch off that

[Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2008-11-03 Thread cwsupport
Here is a patch that works in conjunction with the previous patch. If the ntp daemon is running already it is simply restarted (previous patch includes syncing ntpdate and setting the hwclock in the init.d script). If the ntp daemon is not running already ntpdate-debian is called and the hwclock

Re: [Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2008-11-03 Thread cwsupport
Hi, Yes thats the whole problem! The no-association IDs is caused by ntpd coming up too early - a restart fixes this. What the fix does is PRIOR to S23ntp running ntpd will not be started due to the if-up script - this means that subsequently when S23ntp runs S15bind9 has already come up and

Re: [Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2008-11-03 Thread cwsupport
It will not affect them in any way at all. The ntpd will come up at the right time as specified in rc2.d. Resolution without local DNS will result in gethostbyname() going out to an external DNS and this functionality will not be affected. The fix is therefore transparent to most users (hence

Re: [Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2008-10-26 Thread cwsupport
Hi, I disagree with this diagnosis.. S28NetworkManager is a red-herring. For a start Hardy doesnt have this...Looking at the startup for Hardy: S15bind9 S16openvpn S16ssh S17mysql-ndb-mgm S17portmap S18avahi-daemon S18mysql-ndb S19mysql S20apmd S20apport S20cupsys S20cyrus2.2 S20exim4

[Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2008-10-26 Thread cwsupport
re tampering :) Know how you feel. Because of this I feel it is better to fix the problem at source (pun intended!) and have raised #288914 [ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/288914 ] to try to prompt discussions. When I get a chance I will d/l the source and fix it

Re: [Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2008-10-26 Thread cwsupport
Hi, Onno Benschop wrote: On 25/10/08 04:42, cwsupport wrote: The NTP server comes up down like a yoyo during system boot How did you determine this? I see lots of ntp started messages during startup. -- ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host

Re: [Bug 288478] Re: Ownership of /etc/sasl2db precludes direct access by Cyrus IMAP

2008-10-24 Thread cwsupport
Hi, Im not sure that will help as the permissions of the installed sasldb are root.root with no acl on it. Perhaps the issue is two-fold, the cyrus-common-2.2 install (which I think creates the user) should include the sasl group permission for the cyrus user, and cyrus-sasl2 should correct the

Re: [Bug 288478] Re: Ownership of /etc/sasl2db precludes direct access by Cyrus IMAP

2008-10-24 Thread cwsupport
Hi, The cyrus user *is* in the sasl group. However the permissions on /etc/sasldb2 are root.root. I believe this should either be cryus.sasl or as a minimum root.sasl TTFN Barry Scott Kitterman wrote: Interesting. I checked a couple of my boxes and it was in the sasl group. --

[Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2008-10-24 Thread cwsupport
This IS NOT fixed. Using 4.2.4p4+dfsg-3ubuntu2 on 8.04.1 I have 3 machines doing this and ALL failing. The NTP server comes up down like a yoyo during system boot - which is laughable. The when ntpd is executed from init.d to bring the services up as expected it fails becuase the socket isnt

Re: [Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover

2008-10-24 Thread cwsupport
Hi, All fresh installs. ntp installed POST installation via apt-get. Ubuntu Server 8.04.1 Kubuntu Desktop 8.04.1 KDE4 Remix. Mixture of DHCP and static IP. - As an example the desktop I am email from had 4 network interfaces. 2 static IP and 2 DHCP all specified under /etc/network/interfaces. 2

[Bug 288478] [NEW] Ownership of /etc/sasl2db precludes direct access by Cyrus IMAP

2008-10-23 Thread cwsupport
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sasl2-bin Ubuntu: 8.04.1 Version: 2.1.22.dfsg1-18ubuntu2 The Cyrus IMAP server runs as the user cyrus. But the /etc/sasl2db does not provide sufficient permissions for direct access by the IMAP server. saslauthd has no problems as it runs as root. Fix:

[Bug 287781] [NEW] Nut UPS user does not have access to the serial ports.

2008-10-22 Thread cwsupport
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut Ubuntu Server: 8.04.1 nut: 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7.1 The 'nut' user is not given access to the serial ports. This is because during install of the 'nut' package the user was not added to the 'dialout' group. Fix: usermod -g nut -G dialout nut **