It's a valid hostname (numeric sub-domains are allowed in DNS), but it's
not a valid FQDN. However I'm not convinced that newaliases should fail
like this. Shouldn't it just create an empty alias database? Should
Postfix be policing which TLD's are valid? It seems like that should be
up to the
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: postfix
When upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 the postfix alone failed.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: postfix 2.7.0-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-28.77-server
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-28-server x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date:
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686411/+files/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686412/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz
** Attachment added:
Okay, I took a closer look. The problem is that my hostname is tosh.0.
Somehow this makes something think that my hostname is numeric. Here's
the text:
Setting up postfix (2.7.0-1) ...
Postfix configuration was not changed. If you need to make changes, edit
/etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as
** Attachment added: This is the file that postfix was dying on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/658795/+attachment/1686445/+files/main.cf
--
package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795
You received this bug notification
