[Bug 1257186] Re: memory leakage messages (no talloc stackframe)

2015-07-01 Thread whoop
I did a dist-upgrade with trusty proposed and the leakage message is gone for me... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257186 Title: memory leakage messages (no talloc

[Bug 943664] Re: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-03-08 Thread whoop
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943664 Title: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess

[Bug 943664] [NEW] package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-29 Thread whoop
Public bug reported: slapd failed to install during upgrade from lucid to precise ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-38.83-server 2.6.32.52+drm33.21 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-38-server x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date:

[Bug 943664] Re: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-29 Thread whoop
** Tags added: dist-upgrade -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943664 Title: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new

[Bug 631737] [NEW] gvfsd-smb uses all cpu when trying to connect to samba share

2010-09-06 Thread whoop
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba When I try to connect to a samba share (via typing in the nautilus location bar: smb://servername/sharename) I get an endless hourglass and maximum cpu usage of the gvfsd-smb process. The connection is not possible. This used to work before.

[Bug 631740] Re: Dbus error when clicking network icon in nautilus

2010-09-06 Thread whoop
** Package changed: dbus (Ubuntu) = samba (Ubuntu) -- Dbus error when clicking network icon in nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 631740] Re: Dbus error when clicking network icon in nautilus

2010-09-06 Thread whoop
** Description changed: Binary package hint: dbus When I click the network icon to browse the contents of the network I get maximum cpu usage by gvfsd-smb-brows and and the following error: Could not display network:///. Error: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not

[Bug 532024] Re: gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places--Network

2010-03-06 Thread whoop
Did this use to work properly with a previous release ? This was never tested. dpkg-query -W -f='${Package} ${Version} ${Source} ${Status}\n' | grep samba: libsmbclient 2:3.4.6~dfsg-1ubuntu1 samba install ok installed libsmbclient-dev 2:3.4.6~dfsg-1ubuntu1 samba install ok installed libwbclient0

[Bug 532024] [NEW] gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places--Network

2010-03-04 Thread whoop
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba When I select Places-Network and then double click the Windows Network directory I get a pop-up saying: Opening Windows Network You can stop this operation by clicking cancel. CPU usage goes up to 100% (gvfsd-smb-brows is causing this). It does

[Bug 532024] Re: gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places--Network

2010-03-04 Thread whoop
** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40180015/SambaInstalledVersions.txt -- gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places--Network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532024 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 441669] Re: User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected

2010-02-12 Thread whoop
Yes it is... ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 441669] Re: User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected

2009-10-14 Thread whoop
1. Yes 2. I can reproduce it via the following steps: *Boot xubuntu Karmic 32 bit (with openssh service running) login with an account with restricted rights (no sudo etc.). *Boot another machine (in my case Ubuntu karmic 64bit). Use this machine to connect with xubuntu machine via ssh. Enter

[Bug 441669] Re: User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected

2009-10-14 Thread whoop
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 441669] Re: User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected

2009-10-14 Thread whoop
I don't know what exact version. With previous version I mean Jaunty (and Intrepid, and hardy, and gutsy). The behaviour was different: If the restricted user tried to shutdown (the local machine) while a remote user(with elevated privileges) was logged in, the restricted user would get a