[Bug 1040800] Re: res_config_sqlite should be ported to sqlite3

2012-08-23 Thread Paul Belanger
Right. It just means we have to bump Asterisk from 1.8 to 11, that is when res_config_sqlite3 was added, when we drop sqlite2 and require an upgrade path. ** Tags added: asterisk-11 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to aster

[Bug 1040800] Re: res_config_sqlite should be ported to sqlite3

2012-08-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Right now, it's simply a MOTU Developer initiative. Not a concrete / release team approved goal. I am trying to triange and find packages that: * depend on sqlite2 * have not been ported to sqlite3 OR do not have sqlite3 equivalent packaged Binary package asterisk-modules depends on both sqlite2

[Bug 1040800] Re: res_config_sqlite should be ported to sqlite3

2012-08-23 Thread Paul Belanger
Not sure what you mean. When are we expected to drop sqlite2? If sqlite2 is going to be removed, then we can just updated the asterisk package dependencies and remove it. Hence removing res_config_sqlite and cdr_sqlite. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu S

[Bug 1040800] Re: res_config_sqlite should be ported to sqlite3

2012-08-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Can this be treated as a request to package it? Or am I missing something? $ apt-get download asterisk-modules Get:1 Downloading asterisk-modules 1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1ubuntu1 [2,200 kB] Fetched 1 B in 0s (5 B/s) $ dpkg-deb -c asterisk-modules_1.8.13.0~dfsg-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb | g

[Bug 1040800] Re: res_config_sqlite should be ported to sqlite3

2012-08-23 Thread Paul Belanger
res_config_sqlite3 already exists. So when we drop sqlite2 support, those modules in asterisk will just be disabled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040800 Title: