[Bug 1060900] Re: HTTP proxy config being created in /etc/apt/apt.conf on nodes

2012-10-21 Thread Robie Basak
Thanks for the explanation Ryan! I feel that there must be a better way, such as the apt proxy working with non-standard apt sources without issues. But wanting to disable any existing apt proxy in a charm does make sense. What if debian-installer were changed to always use

[Bug 1060900] Re: HTTP proxy config being created in /etc/apt/apt.conf on nodes

2012-10-20 Thread Ryan Finnie
Ahh, if it is d-i doing it directly, so be it. The reason it should be separated out into a .d entry is basically, splitting out into .d entries are generally more manageable than using a main config file, especially if you want to undo this functionality change. (Remove the .d file rather than

[Bug 1060900] Re: HTTP proxy config being created in /etc/apt/apt.conf on nodes

2012-10-19 Thread Robie Basak
Marking Incomplete pending response. ** Changed in: maas (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060900 Title: HTTP proxy config

[Bug 1060900] Re: HTTP proxy config being created in /etc/apt/apt.conf on nodes

2012-10-16 Thread Robie Basak
I think this is being done automatically by d-i as a result of the proxy being preseeded. In other words, if you automatically install an Ubuntu system without MAAS and preseed a proxy, you'll get the same result. What is the reason that MAAS should do something different from d-i here? Or is