** Patch added: "lxc_utopic.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1379441/+attachment/4229943/+files/lxc_utopic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
---
Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad
** Patch added: "lxc_sru_trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1379441/+attachment/4229945/+files/lxc_sru_trusty.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Thanks for the bug report and the patch. I'm a bit concerned about
supporting this. I understand why you want it, but lxc in general won't
work well with a read-only cache, so an install failure early on would
seem preferable to a lxc-create failure later on.
Would using an overlayfs of the cach
overlayfs, sound good. I will try it to see if it works for me without
patching.
** Patch removed: "lxc_sru_trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1379441/+attachment/4229945/+files/lxc_sru_trusty.debdiff
** Patch removed: "lxc_utopic.debdiff"
https://bugs.laun
[Expired for lxc (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
