[Bug 1532062] Re: Drives mistakenly reported as removable

2016-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package curtin - 0.1.0~bzr351-0ubuntu1 --- curtin (0.1.0~bzr351-0ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium * New upstream snapshot. * partitioning: limited support for odd ordering of partition numbers (LP: #1543263). Specifically targetted at MAAS and

[Bug 1532062] Re: Drives mistakenly reported as removable

2016-02-08 Thread Scott Moser
** Changed in: curtin Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to curtin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532062 Title: Drives mistakenly reported as removable To manage notif

[Bug 1532062] Re: Drives mistakenly reported as removable

2016-02-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~smoser/curtin/trunk.lp1532062 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to curtin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532062 Title: Drives mistakenly reported as removable To manage notifications abo

[Bug 1532062] Re: Drives mistakenly reported as removable

2016-02-08 Thread Scott Moser
more info here, and I'm going to merge Robert's change. On a system the kernel team has, the value of 'removable' changed even from one version of a kernel to another. $ uname -r 4.2.0-27-generic $ cat /sys/class/block/sda/removable 0 But on 4.4.0-2-generic that same sysatem shows that drive as

[Bug 1532062] Re: Drives mistakenly reported as removable

2016-01-25 Thread Robert Clark
** Branch linked: lp:~returntoreptar/curtin/removable-drive-fixes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to curtin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532062 Title: Drives mistakenly reported as removable To manage not

[Bug 1532062] Re: Drives mistakenly reported as removable

2016-01-25 Thread Phillip Susi
I'm guessing that this particular scsi controller supports hot plug and so identifies the drives as removable since technically you can yank out the raid bays and replace them while the system is on. The whole concept of whether a drive is "removable" or not is a hand waving best guess that really

[Bug 1532062] Re: Drives mistakenly reported as removable

2016-01-11 Thread Scott Moser
** Changed in: curtin Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: curtin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to curtin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532062 Title

[Bug 1532062] Re: Drives mistakenly reported as removable

2016-01-11 Thread Robert Clark
Sure no problem! I have attached the output of sudo lshw as a file, since it was a bit long. ** Attachment added: "Output of lshw on system with "removable" drives." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curtin/+bug/1532062/+attachment/4548195/+files/lshw-output-anakin -- You received th

[Bug 1532062] Re: Drives mistakenly reported as removable

2016-01-11 Thread Scott Moser
Robert, I took a quick gander at util-linux source, and it is just reading /sys/class/block//removable There isnt' any util-linux specific knowledge that says "this is removable", but rather its just telling you what the kernel is telling it. Would you mind posting/attaching: sudo lshw ? I r