[Bug 1703490] Re: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server

2017-07-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
sec= in mount.cifs is a client setting, I was quoting the mount.cifs manpage where it says when that changed defaults in the (client machine's) kernel. Either way, I believe the solution to what you reported is in the first paragraph of comment #21. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1703490] Re: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server

2017-07-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ok, so you either change your clients to use "sec=ntlmssp", or change "ntlm auth" on the server to "yes" as explained by @metze in comment #17. This sec= setting in mount.cifs also changed defaults. From its manpage: "The default in mainline kernel versions prior to v3.8 was sec=ntlm. In v3.8,

[Bug 1703490] Re: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server

2017-07-13 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Can you try Stefan's suggestion from comment #17 please? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703490 Title: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server To manage

[Bug 1703490] Re: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server

2017-07-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
It could be that, in the case where /etc/fstab is used, there are extra options being passed to mount.cifs and that is what is causing the difference in behaviour. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1703490] Re: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server

2017-07-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
IP addresses work fine too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703490 Title: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1703490] Re: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server

2017-07-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Here is what I got with xfce on 16.04 using thunar. Just the home share is read-only, as expected. ** Attachment added: "thunar-xfce.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1703490/+attachment/4913443/+files/thunar-xfce.png -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1703490] Re: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server

2017-07-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Sorry about your frustration, we are just trying to narrow it down. It could be that something in artful's samba changed and that thunar needs to adapt, for example. We need to determine why this test case that you mentioned when opening the bug doesn't work: """ 16.04 client mount.cifs to 17.10

[Bug 1703490] Re: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server

2017-07-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Let's try to narrow it down to a simple test case involving smbclient and/or mount.cifs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703490 Title: Unable to mount network volume

[Bug 1703490] Re: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server

2017-07-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I tried your shares, and they seem to work as expected. Note that [Homes] is read only (default for "read only" is "yes"), so you won't be able to write to Homes or even Maps under it while connected to Homes, but if you connect to Maps, then you can: oot@nsn7:~# for d in Home Maps Media; do

[Bug 1703490] Re: Unable to mount network volume on 17.10 Samba server

2017-07-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Thanks for filing this bug in Ubuntu. Could you please share your /etc/samba/smb.conf on that 17.10 server? The output of "testparm -s" would be best. I tried the same here and could mount the share just fine from xenial. Maybe you restricted the smb protocol to higher versions? mount.cifs will