Sure!
David,
I'm currently running a build from the REVU packages in the PPA; if all
goes well you shouldn't have to copy any of the Karmic packages and our
versioning will end up being very similar to official.
Tim
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad
That's great! Please make coordination with David sugar and make good use
of the Ubuntu 389 server project team PPA. You are also now one of the
administrators so should have enough privilege to manipulate the team PPA.
After launchpad approves our team email list, communication will be
easier.
I am going to fill the ppa with at least initial packages based on the
original ones from Timothy starting tomorrow evening. At least it will
let people test them. If we get this into Debian first, then it could
get into Karmic as a merge request.
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server fo
I am currently working with upstream Debian on this...hopefully things
will progress rapidly now.
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subs
We have formed the Ubuntu 389 directory server team and this project now
becomes team-managed
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Timothy Pearson (kb9vqf) => Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team
(ubuntu-389-directory-server)
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.laun
I had a chat with David Sugar (I believe he is a staff member from
Canonical). He suggests us to form a dedicated team to set up and
maintain the 389 directory server.
I have just done that and now we have got a new team called "Ubuntu 389
Directory Server Team"
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-389
Hi Michele,
I sent you an Email--hopefully I can help with your packaging. You're
right, it does not make sense to be maintaining two separate versions.
Thanks!
Tim
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463
You received this bug notification
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 22:26 +, Timothy Pearson wrote:
> Hey, sorry for the lack of progress on this bug, but my servers were
> fried by a lightning-related EMP on Friday (June 19) and therefore I've
> been unable to do anything since then. ( more details are on a temporary
> website at http://a
Hey, sorry for the lack of progress on this bug, but my servers were
fried by a lightning-related EMP on Friday (June 19) and therefore I've
been unable to do anything since then. ( more details are on a temporary
website at http://apt.pearsoncomputing.net )
However, before that time, it was decid
I will try to build the Jaunty packages ASAP, but first there is a
potential REVU issue--they seem to want .orig.tar.gz files, and I need
to go through and test build from original sources. That process might
take some time, and I won't be able to get to the Jaunty packages until
that is complete.
Hey Kai-Cheung,
Sorry I wasn't more explicit, but I *did* rebuild the required libraries
from Tim's repo for jaunty. It still doesn't build properly for me. ;)
I suspect that perhaps the build-deps on the packages aren't totally
accurate, since I'm building on a fresh jaunty install inside a VM,
Graeme:
The reason why fedora-directory-server_1.2.0-2.dsc doesn't build on your
jaunty system is because it relies on many libraries (such as
libsvrcore-dev) which are also along Tim's upload.
So you really need to test build these libraries first, then after they
are built, include Tim's PPA:
Tim:
Is it possible to get packages for jaunty into your repo? I'm getting
errors trying to rebuild the packages on jaunty/amd64. It freaks out and
generates a ton of errors trying to compile this:
/bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-DBUILD_NUM=\"2009.161.2056\"
I definitely agree about introducing into Karmic. That way there'll be
some wider usage and testing before the next LTS.
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
Dear Ubuntu-server and Ubuntu-desktop:
If you are also a REVU reviewer, would you please have a quick look at
the new Fedora Directory Server package for ubuntu?
Blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/fedora-directory-server-
inclusion
The Fedora Directory server is the most
15 matches
Mail list logo
