[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2009-09-21 Thread Thierry Carrez
In main now ** Changed in: jetty6 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- MIR jetty6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to jetty6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing l

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-01-26 Thread Thierry Carrez
** Also affects: jetty (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- MIR jetty6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to jetty6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-01-26 Thread Thierry Carrez
The "jetty" package in debian was finally updated to version 6, so that makes the partial jetty6 package we introduced for eucalyptus in karmic mostly redundant (and unsyncable). For lucid, I want to get rid of that redundant package and use the generic "jetty" one instead. I ported all Ubuntu imp

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-01-27 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: jetty (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti) -- MIR jetty6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to jetty6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ub

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-01-27 Thread Martin Pitt
This looks ok, if we can ignore the server part and leave that in universe. The binary package name changed, though (libjetty6-java -> libjetty-java), so this needs a dependency change in euca. I promoted the package. Can you please do the dependency change in euca, so that we can remove the jetty

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-01-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Reopening jetty6 task as a reminder ** Changed in: jetty6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: jetty6 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => In Progress ** Changed in: jetty6 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Thierry Carrez (ttx) -- MIR jetty6 https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-01-28 Thread Thierry Carrez
** Also affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Thierry Ca

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-01-28 Thread Thierry Carrez
jetty6->jetty migration in eucalyptus is now committed in bzr ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- MIR jetty6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-01-29 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Thierry- I can see you've committed the changes to eucalyptus bzr. I don't understand why the jetty6 task is still open and assigned to you, Thierry. What's still to be done to the jetty6 package, and is it something that you, or an Archive Admin actually needs to do? -- MIR jetty6 https://bug

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-02-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package eucalyptus - 1.6.2~bzr1136-0ubuntu2 --- eucalyptus (1.6.2~bzr1136-0ubuntu2) lucid; urgency=low [ Thierry Carrez ] * debian/control, debian/build-jars, debian/eucalyptus-java-common.links: Migrate from jetty6 to jetty (LP: #418836) [ Dustin

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-02-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/eucalyptus -- MIR jetty6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modi

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-02-02 Thread Martin Pitt
eucalyptus failed to build. The only other package that currently still depends on jetty6 is gwt, I open a task for it as well: -- lucid/main build deps on libjetty6-java: gwt -- lucid/main amd64 deps on libjetty6-java: eucalyptus-java-common -- lucid/main i386 deps on libjetty6-java: eucalyptus-

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-02-02 Thread Thierry Carrez
** Changed in: gwt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Thierry Carrez (ttx) -- MIR jetty6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-02-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gwt - 1.6.4-0ubuntu5 --- gwt (1.6.4-0ubuntu5) lucid; urgency=low * debian/control, debian/rules: Build with swt-gtk-3.5 and jetty, fixes LP: #418836 -- Thierry CarrezTue, 02 Feb 2010 15:18:15 -0800 ** Changed in: gwt (Ubuntu) Status

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-02-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/gwt -- MIR jetty6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify sett

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-02-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
@Martin: eucalyptus is now built, gwt fixed, you should be able to proceed. -- MIR jetty6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubu

[Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-02-04 Thread Martin Pitt
2010-02-04 14:48:56 INFORemoving candidates: 2010-02-04 14:48:56 INFOjetty6 6.1.19-0ubuntu4 in lucid 2010-02-04 14:48:56 INFOlibjetty6-extra-java 6.1.19-0ubuntu4 in lucid amd64 2010-02-04 14:48:56 INFOlibjetty6-extra-java 6.1.19-0ubuntu4 in lucid armel 2010-02-04 14:48

Re: [Bug 418836] Re: MIR jetty6

2010-01-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Dustin Kirkland [2010-01-29 16:29 -]: > I don't understand why the jetty6 task is still open and assigned to > you, Thierry. What's still to be done to the jetty6 package, and is it > something that you, or an Archive Admin actually needs to do? I kept it open as a reminder to remove jetty6 f