probably
--
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing
Chuck, you're thinking this is that Debian bug that had an advisory last
week right?
--
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Tea
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Chuck Short (zulcss) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low => Medium
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Chuck Short (zulcss
Chuck Short wrote:
> @Joe,
>
> have you tried the configuratoin change as suggested?
>
> Thanks
> chuck
>
>
Hey Chuck, yea to the extreme I think it's at maybe 1 or 100 for
MaxRequestsPerChild, but it seems to resemble the old bug on the
surface. Either way it's quieted down for me, thanks for
@Joe,
have you tried the configuratoin change as suggested?
Thanks
chuck
--
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which i
Chuck Short wrote:
> @Joe:
>
> Its marked Low so our qa scripts pick it up. Ill take a look at this
> again after karmic has been released.
>
> Regards
> chuck
>
>
Ah, ok, cool. Thanks Chuck.
--
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after
-updates
https://b
@Joe:
Its marked Low so our qa scripts pick it up. Ill take a look at this
again after karmic has been released.
Regards
chuck
--
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification b
Chuck Short wrote:
> ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
>Importance: Undecided => Low
>
>
Chuck, was wondering, should this be marked Low from Undecided if it
hasn't been confirmed nor denied by anyone?
--
Joe McDonagh
Operations Engineer
www.colonfail.com
--
Slow memory leak, seen on two
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribe
Stefan, thanks for re-iterating the MaxRequestsPerChild tidbit, I had
forgotten that option was for lifetime, not concurrency. That'll
probably help workaround momentarily.
Also, I am not currently doing any tweaking wrt the SSLSessionCache, I
recall messing with it when I first started seeing thi
> > A workaround may be to add MaxRequestsPerChild 1000 (or an even lower
> > value) to your configuration.
> >
> >
> That wouldn't really help since long-running children just hold onto
> memory no matter what it seems.
A lower MaxRequestsPerChild should make the children terminate earlier.
> Do
Hi Stefan, thanks for the response. My responses are in-line.
> Is the parameter -f TLS1 necessary to reproduce the problem?
>
No, same behavior. Long-running children just never free up the memory
as long as I am hitting the SSL port, seemingly regardless if I pass an
algorithm to AB or not.
Is the parameter -f TLS1 necessary to reproduce the problem?
Is the URL / of your webserver a php page? If yes, why is the content
length of the page 0, what does the php script do? If not php, what is
it? A simple redirect?
A workaround may be to add MaxRequestsPerChild 1000 (or an even lower
va
This took down a box today, had to visit the DC for it... is there any
more information-gathering I can do for you or myself here?
--
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification
Chuck, is there anything else you need from me to promote this from
incomplete?
--
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, wh
Sorry forgot to attach the output of AB after I killed it:
ab -n 200 -c 100 -f TLS11 https://scan-stag.osdc/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.ap
Hey Chuck, thanks for the response. The command is:
ab -n 200 -c 100 -f TLS11 https://webserver/
At ten seconds:
30253 www-data 20 0 254m 75m 4432 S 31 0.5 0:03.50 apache2
30252 www-data 20 0 251m 72m 4464 S 30 0.4 0:03.34 apache2
30250 www-data 2
Interesting,
Can you specify the ab command that you used to reproduce this?
Thanks
chuck
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Chuck Short (zulcss)
--
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to
18 matches
Mail list logo
