This is really towards the publishing scripts, but marking package as
vm-builder.
** Package changed: ubuntu => vm-builder (Ubuntu)
--
rename uec kernel/ramdisk for automated downloading or easier doc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444598
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu Karmic)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-9.10
--
rename uec kernel/ramdisk for automated downloading or easier doc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444598
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-bui
** Also affects: vm-builder (Ubuntu Karmic)
Importance: Low
Assignee: Scott Moser (smoser)
Status: Confirmed
--
rename uec kernel/ramdisk for automated downloading or easier doc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444598
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
A couple options here are:
- symlinks
ubuntu-uec-amd64-kernel -> ubuntu-uec-karmic-amd64-vmlinuz-2.6.31-11-server
ubuntu-uec-i386-ramdisk ->
ubuntu-uec-karmic-i386-initrd.img-2.6.31-11-generic-pae
- LATEST (or otherwise named) file containing:
ubuntu-uec-amd64-kernel ubuntu-uec-karmic-amd64
** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu Karmic)
Importance: Low => High
--
UEC images could be simpler to download and bundle
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444598
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.
--
Ub
** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Summary changed:
- rename uec kernel/ramdisk for automated downloading or easier doc
+ UEC images could be simpler to download and bundle
--
UEC images could be simpler to download and bundle
https://bugs.launchpad
Or a tarball of all of the pertinent pieces?
:-Dustin
--
rename uec kernel/ramdisk for automated downloading or easier doc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444598
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.
--
U
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> Or a tarball of all of the pertinent pieces?
That would be possible, yes, but even inside the tarball, you'd want to
provide predictable names, or a mechanism to obtain the names.
All a simply-named tar file does is move the problem to the local syste
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
>
>> Or a tarball of all of the pertinent pieces?
>
> That would be possible, yes, but even inside the tarball, you'd want to
> provide predictable names, or a mechanism to obtain the names.
Said tarba
