** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ub
>> Another option would be to add details on how to install the local
>> package and view it in the motd.
> I'd rather opt for this option.
That seems to be bug #159371, then. Does the patch at the end of that
bug address this issue to everyone's satisfaction?
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Instal
Works for me.
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify sett
The patch for 159371 has been uploaded, so I believe this bug should now
be considered resolved (or at least as resolved as it's going to get for
hardy).
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.laun
Pushing for a conclusion...?
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
We can mark as fix release correct for the Ubuntu doc side of things?
THanks,
Jonathan
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ubun
It seems there's discussion of having a base "server" seed for other
reasons (c.f. recent discussion of w3m on the ubuntu-devel list), in
which case it's probably worth getting the Ubuntu Server Guide seeded
there?
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45
Reopening this bug, as per Steve's comment at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
docs/+bug/45944/comments/36 it should be possible to seed ubuntu-
serverguide for intrepid now that there is a server seed.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
Closing the ubuntu-docs task, as this bug needs to be fixed in ubuntu-
meta.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This is fixed in Intrepid; there's now a server seed containing ubuntu-
serverguide, and it's installed by default.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this
That seems reasonable enough. Since we apparently can't distinguish the
server version from the desktop version this general message is a reasonable
pointer to the relevant docs.
This does not resolve the issue of the guide not being available to people
experiencing problems with their network con
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Steve Langasek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems there's discussion of having a base "server" seed for other
> reasons (c.f. recent discussion of w3m on the ubuntu-devel list), in
> which case it's probably worth getting the Ubuntu Server Guide seeded
> there
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:49:31 -
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems there's discussion of having a base "server" seed for other
> reasons (c.f. recent discussion of w3m on the ubuntu-devel list), in
> which case it's probably worth getting the Ubuntu Server Guide seeded
> there
13 matches
Mail list logo
