Okay, I thought ufw was enable during the samba installed. I did not install or
activate it manual.
I think it would be to hard to figure out why it was enabled on my system.
I second, that a firewall should not open any ports automatically without user
interaction.
If samba does not activate ufw
While samba suggests ufw, ufw is not enabled on installation and so
default installations are not affected. That said, it has been brought
up that perhaps ufw should open up ports on an enabled firewall when a
package is installed in Ubuntu. There are pros and cons to this, and it
is a contentious
Hi,
thank you for your answer. I think it is atleast an documentation issue then.
If I install samba and samba suggests ufw, which in fact blocks samba the
default configuration isn't working.
The samba ufw profile should be activated by default or the user should get an
info that he has to do so
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This is not a bug in samba or in ufw, but rather a local
configuration issue. You had ufw enabled, which blocks packets. You
therefore need to adjust your firewall to allow samba connections. See
https://bugs.launch
** Also affects: ufw
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468197
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34850273/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34850274/XsessionErrors.txt
--
ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468197
You
