lucid has bacula 5.0.1 now.
Regards
chuck
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
[FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515274
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula
i386 proved to be unreliable; couldn't even complete the lucid install.
Now have built an amd64 system, but am using full-disk encryption and
cannot even boot the system to the point where I can attempt to install
Chuck Short's PPA. Still trying...
--
[FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1
Martin,
We ship the default configuration files so it would be up to the user to
look at their settings and see how they fit int. Maybe put a note in the
README.Debian
Regards
chuck
--
[FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515274
You received this bug notification
OK, thanks for the update. Looks okay then, please go ahead.
--
[FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515274
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Excelent
** Summary changed:
- Latest Stable is 5.0.0
+ [FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1
--
[FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515274
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.
--
Hi,
I wish to ask for a FFE exception so that we can get bacula 5.0.1 into
lucid. The reason for this FFE are the following:
- Debian will be moving to 5.0 for Lucid
- 3.0 is ancient and it will probably EOL during Lucid's lifecycle.
- Easier to maintain from the developer perspective.
I
** Attachment added: debdiff.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41298794/debdiff.gz
--
[FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515274
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: bacula_5.0.1-1ubuntu1-amd64-20100318-1049
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41298841/bacula_5.0.1-1ubuntu1-amd64-20100318-1049
--
[FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515274
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
Changelog:
- We believe that we have resolved most of the problems
concerning canceled or failed jobs being stuck in the
Director. There is one outstanding problem in the SD when
canceling jobs that we will fix in the next major release.
If you see jobs that seem to be stuck, in general
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-10.04-beta-2 = None
--
[FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515274
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
I haven't attempted to participate in testing a pre-release Ubuntu
package before, so please bear with me. I'd very much like to see
Bacula 5.0.x make it into Lucid. I have reformatted a machine with
Lucid Alpha 3 to install Chuck Short's test package onto. This machine
is i386 rather than
The changelog looks appropriate, mostly bug fixes. And indeed it's much
easier to have the same version than Debian Squeeze.
- The default for Allow Duplicate Jobs has been changed from no to yes. If
you use this directive, please check your conf file, and note the next two
items
12 matches
Mail list logo
