[Bug 604400] Re: Confusing comment in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf

2010-12-10 Thread Etienne Goyer
Dave: again, sorry I can't produce the correct text, as I am not sure what the exact behavior is supposed to be. Feel free to mark as Won't Fix, if you think it does not deserve to be clarified. ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Confirmed -- You received this bug

[Bug 604400] Re: Confusing comment in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf

2010-12-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for eucalyptus (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

[Bug 604400] Re: Confusing comment in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf

2010-07-12 Thread Dave Walker
@Etienne, Thanks for reporting this bug. A fix for this seems to be suitable for the SRU process, but personally i feel it should be bundled with another SRU as in itself; it's not serious enough to warrant an SRU. Would you mind providing a suitable concise line that it should be replaced with?

[Bug 604400] Re: Confusing comment in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf

2010-07-12 Thread Etienne Goyer
Dave: I would love to, except I am not too sure what the expected behavior is. It would be best if someone who actually knows what's going on write the text in question. -- Confusing comment in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604400 You received this bug

[Bug 604400] Re: Confusing comment in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf

2010-07-11 Thread Etienne Goyer
For the record, that bug made me lost a couple of hours, and left me quite frustrated. I think it is serious enough to deserve a fix (ie, clarifying the behavior in the in-line comment). -- Confusing comment in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604400 You received