[Bug 707098] Re: oom change in 1:5.3p1-3ubuntu5 causes operation not permitted

2011-01-26 Thread Alan Porter
Agreed... this looks more like pilot error than anything else. The update caught be by surprise. I should have known better, though... if my config file had not been modified by me or my Virtuozzo provider, then I would not have been asked whether or not I wanted the new change. In either case,

[Bug 707098] Re: oom change in 1:5.3p1-3ubuntu5 causes operation not permitted

2011-01-25 Thread Andres Rodriguez
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New = Opinion ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707098

[Bug 707098] Re: oom change in 1:5.3p1-3ubuntu5 causes operation not permitted

2011-01-25 Thread Colin Watson
Opinion isn't the right status here. Alan, firstly (and tangentially, I suppose), the openssh update was a normal update, not a security update. That aside, we didn't change the oom line in that update, only the expect and exec lines. Here's the full diff:

[Bug 707098] Re: oom change in 1:5.3p1-3ubuntu5 causes operation not permitted

2011-01-24 Thread Alan Porter
Looking a little deeper, it looks like OpenSSH has had this oom never line ever since Ubuntu 10.04 came out, and that Virtuozzo containers have had to modify this file all along. I never saw it before because my Virtuozzo provider had a pristine 10.04 image that they deployed -- I assume, with