This has been added to openvswitch already.
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808224
Title:
I pushed the fix to the Open vSwitch Git "master", so the next Debian
upload should fix this bug, once it propagates to Ubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80822
I posted a patch here:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2011-July/009879.html
I've only partially tested it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808224
Title:
ov
> @Ben: Can you comment on why it's use is discouraged?
A few reasons:
* Its original goal was to support XAPI on Citrix XenServer, in versions of
XenServer before OVS was integrated. We implemented exactly the feature set
required for that. There could easily be important omissions.
* Unlike
(Setting importance to Wishlist as it is a request for a new feature
(although it is documented in the manpage as being avaliable))
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8
Hi,
@Ben: Can you comment on why it's use is discouraged?
Also, do you plan to make a binary package for it in Debian, if we are
to add it - i'd rather avoid diverging.
Thanks!
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification becau
I don't see value in having two kernel module packages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808224
Title:
ovs-brcompatd not built
To manage notifications about this
Hi Ben. Thanks.
I think it makes perfect sense to add another binary package for ovs-brcompatd.
Does it make sense to to separate the two kernel modules into two packages from
the current DKMS since it now builds the brcompatd module automatically while
it is not really recommended. Ideally, one
Speaking as the Debian and upstream maintainer for Open vSwitch, ovs-
brcompatd isn't in the upstream Debian version of the package because we
don't want to encourage people to use it.
It might make sense to add another binary package for ovs-brcompatd, if
you really need it.
The DKMS package is
