Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Elementary OS

2015-08-31 Thread Set Hallström
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:17 PM, ttoine wrote: > > My idea is not to divide. My idea is to understand how we can gather more > people around this original project: "produce multimedia with Open Source > software" > I think i understood that, what i ment is that i'm dubitous

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Elementary OS

2015-08-31 Thread Mike Holstein
On Monday, August 31, 2015, ttoine wrote: > Thanks guys for your answers. > > Perhaps we should join the effort of KXstudio and develop something with > its dev (if he agrees). I don't what is the best, that is why I send this > my emai. I just feel that we are screwed with

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Packages up for removal, unless someone wants to maintain them

2015-08-31 Thread Len Ovens
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Ross Gammon wrote: I was just looking at a couple of bugs against zynjacku, and it turns out that this package was removed from Debian a while ago because it is buggy and abandoned upstream zynjacku can be replaced with lv2rack and/or jalv. I would also suggest we

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Elementary OS

2015-08-31 Thread Len Ovens
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, ttoine wrote: The fact is in the past, it cost me a lot of money to buy many "pro" sound card to test and debug drivers (RME and Echo are pretty expensive...). The As you may guess, that is not likely to happen any more. alsa-firmware package would not work in Ubuntu

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature Spec Discussion: Desktop Agnostic

2015-08-31 Thread Len Ovens
On Sun, April 26, 2015 4:05 am, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > Also, we have not settled on whether or not we should have our own > default DE once we are offering multiple choices. I know this email is old, but after some of the other talk, I have reached an opinion. It is possible to get audio to

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Elementary OS

2015-08-31 Thread Jimmy Sjölund
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:46 AM, ttoine wrote: > Thanks guys for your answers. > > Perhaps we should join the effort of KXstudio and develop something with > its dev (if he agrees). I don't what is the best, that is why I send this > my emai. I just feel that we are screwed

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Elementary OS

2015-08-31 Thread Set Hallstrom
"Divided we fall, united we stand" "We are because you are, and since you are, definitely I am" I'm super happy with ubuntustudio. I'm not sure being able to get economic compensation would further push the quality of ubuntustudio. Look at what you guys have achieved without!!! Its a beautiful

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Elementary OS

2015-08-31 Thread ttoine
Thanks guys for your answers. Perhaps we should join the effort of KXstudio and develop something with its dev (if he agrees). I don't what is the best, that is why I send this my emai. I just feel that we are screwed with Canonical until we use a Ubuntu derivative name. Antoine THOMAS Tél:

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Elementary OS

2015-08-31 Thread brian
Hear hear! (aka. I second that!) brian On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:44:49 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote: > "Divided we fall, united we stand" > "We are because you are, and since you are, definitely I am" > > I'm super happy with ubuntustudio. I'm not sure being able to get > economic

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Elementary OS

2015-08-31 Thread ttoine
The fact is in the past, it cost me a lot of money to buy many "pro" sound card to test and debug drivers (RME and Echo are pretty expensive...). The alsa-firmware package would not work in Ubuntu without this investment I had. At the moment, we miss someone with pro video equipment, like