Re: A feature for -lowlatency kernel?

2011/4/11 Alessio Igor Bogani : > Dear Ubuntu Studio Developers, > > 2011/3/25 Alessio Igor Bogani : > [...] >>> So I could provide a -lowlatency kernel based on 39 kernel if enough >>> testers will offer theirs help. Sincerely I would want avoid to waste >>> time for make something that no one wil

Re: A feature for -lowlatency kernel?

2011/3/25 Alessio Igor Bogani : > Dear Ubuntu Studio Developers, > > Yesterday Ailo has reported in IRC channel that the 2.6.39 mainline > Linux kernel is going to provide an useful and interesting feature: > threaded irqs. > > Until now that feature was provided by realtime kernels only. It is > t

Re: avidemux not working with JACK2

Okay, solved this myself and built a new package in PPA for immediate use. Anyone cares to sponsor the patch? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avidemux/+bug/614896 --Artem 2010/8/7 Артём Попов : > Hi, > > I have no problems with JACK2 at all, but avidemux fails to install &g

avidemux not working with JACK2

Hi, I have no problems with JACK2 at all, but avidemux fails to install correctly (it still depends on jackd1). Apparently, there is a new version uploaded, but it's not in the archive due to an FTBFS: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/avidemux/1:2.5.3-0ubuntu2 Any idea how to r

Re: Which of jackd's will be in main?

2010/7/19 Luke Yelavich : > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:15:07PM CEST, Артём Попов wrote: >> Hi (especially Luke), >> >> I wonder if there has been any planning of which jackd will be in >> Maverick's main component. While I'd prefer jackd2 (which I have been &

Which of jackd's will be in main?

Hi (especially Luke), I wonder if there has been any planning of which jackd will be in Maverick's main component. While I'd prefer jackd2 (which I have been using for 2 months without problems), there could be reasons for sticking with jackd1. So, which is going to be in Maverick's main? Reasons?