-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On December 8, 2016 3:23:45 PM GMT+01:00, Fritz Meissner
wrote:
>
>
>Could you clarify this : searching on FB I found an Ubuntu Studio page,
>and
>an Ubuntu Studio group. Which do you mean here ?
>
>Fritz
>
Good point.
The main group (there a few
On 8 December 2016 at 04:04, C. F. Howlett wrote:
> Greetings Art Team et al:
>
>
> I would like to test something prior to launching the 17.04 wallpaper
> contest: submitting visual content to the Ubuntu Studio Facebook group
> page. I believe this would be more efficient and effective than the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On December 8, 2016 3:04:53 AM GMT+01:00, "C. F. Howlett"
wrote:
>Greetings Art Team et al:
>
>
>I would like to test something prior to launching the 17.04 wallpaper
>contest: submitting visual content to the Ubuntu Studio Facebook group
>page. I
Greetings Art Team et al:
I would like to test something prior to launching the 17.04 wallpaper
contest: submitting visual content to the Ubuntu Studio Facebook group
page. I believe this would be more efficient and effective than the
somewhat convoluted method we used last time.
The test f
BTW
On 2016-11-21 08:36, C. F. Howlett wrote:
> Zoom in to see the magic. [url filtered]
Are these filtered out by the mailing-list, or did you send the mail
like that?
--
Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ub
Thank you very much for setting this up cfhowlett! You rock!
Like i said on IRC, i think ttoine and Eylul's feedback is very good and
you should take it in account. Then feel free to proceed with sending it
out from any and all the channels we have available :)
I offer to add something to the co
I won't use GPL for artwork, btw. It is possible for a SVG because it is
XML, but not for a picture.
About photography, if we don't want that, we must clarify why. The common
issue with photography is rights on what is on the picture (Eiffel tower at
night, for example, is copyrighted by the compa
This looks great overall! Now some comments:
1) works should also be licensed with an open license. (we can narrow
that down further to something like CC-SA, CC and CC0 and GPL only)
Submitters should at least specify what the license is if not add a copy
of the license file.
2) any source images
Hey UbuntuStudio:
I'm preparing to run a wallpaper contest for the 10th Year of Ubuntu
Studio (17.04 for those who were unaware).
I learned some valuable lessons from the 16.04 contest so this time will
be a bit different in the hopes of yielding some truly outstanding
results. Please review
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, at 06:36 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, at 06:28 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > On 02/16/2016 01:49 PM, C. F. Howlett wrote:
> > > ART TEAM NOTE: Hotwheel, by Lui Li Hua was in the top 3 throughout this
> > > election cycle and was #1 in the final
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, at 06:28 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On 02/16/2016 01:49 PM, C. F. Howlett wrote:
> > ART TEAM NOTE: Hotwheel, by Lui Li Hua was in the top 3 throughout this
> > election cycle and was #1 in the final tally. Absent objections or
> > suggestions, I assign Hotwheel as
Hi All,
On 02/16/2016 01:49 PM, C. F. Howlett wrote:
> ART TEAM NOTE: Hotwheel, by Lui Li Hua was in the top 3 throughout this
> election cycle and was #1 in the final tally. Absent objections or
> suggestions, I assign Hotwheel as the default wallpaper for the 16.04
> release. As we are trying
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 01:49 PM, C. F. Howlett wrote:
> *** READ ME
>
> 16.04 Wallpaper Contest Winners
>
> This is the completed list of 16.04 Wallpapers as per the public vote
> conducted 02/11/16 - 02/15/16. Final outcome is documented at the
> Condorcet voting link.
>
>
> NOTE 1: Ad
*** READ ME
16.04 Wallpaper Contest Winners
This is the completed list of 16.04 Wallpapers as per the public vote
conducted 02/11/16 - 02/15/16. Final outcome is documented at the
Condorcet voting link.
NOTE 1: Adam Tuba had two winning entries; Wallpaper1 and Wallpaper1B.
These entries
The current-standard repo is updated -
lp:~ubuntustudio-art/ubuntustudio-artwork/current-standard
I had forgotten what the defect in the CoF was, and noticed earlier that
it was actually present in the CoF I had provided, which makes the ones
cfhowlett provided correct (somehow, my eye is telling
I've done some cleaning up of our artwork branch, and set up a new
routine for us when dealing with artwork material.
There are now three branches as you can see here
https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntustudio-artwork
Before I explain a bit more, I want to clarify one thing about the LP
urls.
lp:ubu
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:57 AM, set wrote:
>
> Do we have a trace of the written permission from canonical to use the
> brand? If so, does it need to be renewed?
>
> Not that I know of or have seen. Ttoine would probably have the best
knowledge as he was dabbling with all the permissions when se
On 2016-01-08 10:57, set wrote:
> I have no interest in ownership of my contribution to
> ubuntu-studio, meaning; if canonical would, for whatever reason chose a
> direction that would render ubuntu-studio unuseable for me, i would give
> my thanks for the experience acquired and focus my output el
On 2016-01-08 08:54, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On 1/8/2016 at 2:24 AM, "set" wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-01-07 19:38, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>> On 1/7/2016 at 2:08 AM, "C. F. Howlett"
>>> wrote:
Precisely what Ubuntustudio brandmarks, logos or other design
assets are app
On 1/8/2016 at 2:24 AM, "set" wrote:
>
>On 2016-01-07 19:38, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
>> On 1/7/2016 at 2:08 AM, "C. F. Howlett"
>> wrote:
>>> Precisely what Ubuntustudio brandmarks, logos or other design
>>> assets are approved for use? Where, exactly, can I find those
>>> approved asse
I am indeed referrring to that, and the license I am referring to is
Ubuntu's statements concerning their logo and derivative works.
Those statements meant that icon was replaced in my icon set
prior to distribution.
On 1/8/2016 at 2:24 AM, "set" wrote:
>
>On 2016-01-07 19:38, lukefro...@hushmail
On 2016-01-07 19:38, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
> On 1/7/2016 at 2:08 AM, "C. F. Howlett"
> wrote:
>> Precisely what Ubuntustudio brandmarks, logos or other design
>> assets are approved for use? Where, exactly, can I find those
>> approved assets?
> That logo issue differs enough from the r
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 12:53 PM, set wrote:
> On 2016-01-07 08:08, C. F. Howlett wrote:
> >
> > Precisely what Ubuntustudio brandmarks, logos or other design assets
> > are approved for use? Where, exactly, can I find those approved
> > assets?
>
> Thanks for asking, i'm wondering too.
>
> >> Wh
As discussed previously in this channel, Set and I are coordinating an
Ubuntustudio 16.04 Wallpaper Contest to generate PR and new wallpaper
designs. Details are at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Artwork/UserShowcase
Unfortunately, my information is dated. I erroneously recommended th
24 matches
Mail list logo
