On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
If a user gets the setup right in the first place, there seldom is the
need for cheap workarounds such as a bridge to pulseaudio.
Which one is the "cheap workaround" is a matter of opinion.
Note, it doesn't matter what distro I prefer to use myself, si
Pulseaudio often isn't needed at all and furthermore it has got
counter-productive effects for most professional audio work. For
workarounds there is software such as apulse, see
https://github.com/i-rinat/apulse , let alone that some apps such as
Firefox support alsa, as well as jack, just build F
I've always used qjackctl if I needed to set up something non-default in jack,
had little trouble with it. Even used it on a netbook for a while to set up
sound
to deal with mono files (not supported in harware on that machine) by running
jack, which was much lighter on that machine running direct
Hi Thomas,
> On Apr 2, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Thomas Pfundt wrote:
>
> On April 2, 2018 4:33 PM, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>> FalkTX has just released Cadence v0.9.0, having finished porting it to Qt5.
>> This would definitely be another reason we should consider moving from
>> QJackCtl to Cadence, al
I'm using Cadence since 2011 in the radio station I'm working; it help us a
lot to have a workflow with many users working simultaneously with
Pulseaudio and Jack, in a transparent way, thanks to their
Pulseaudio-to-Jack bridge.
My users need to work with a Jack app (Rivendell, a radio automation
On April 2, 2018 4:33 PM, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> FalkTX has just released Cadence v0.9.0, having finished porting it to Qt5.
> This would definitely be another reason we should consider moving from
> QJackCtl to Cadence, along with the extra tools Cadence includes.
Without using as much of
> On Apr 2, 2018, at 8:32 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Here we go:
>
> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/
All this does is point to the ISO repos. This adds nothing to your argument.
> Upgrading from one to another release, should still allow you to
> continue using Ubuntu Studi
Here we go:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/
Upgrading from one to another release, should still allow you to
continue using Ubuntu Studio without major inconveniences. If newcomers
would be allowed to overturn basal preconditions, completely ignoring
backwards compatibility with
> On Apr 2, 2018, at 7:44 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 07:33:05 -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>> moving from QJackCtl to Cadence
>
> Dropping QjackCtl in favour of Cadence? If so, that's utter nonsense!
There’s no need to be rude, it was just an idea. All ideas are welcome h
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 07:33:05 -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>moving from QJackCtl to Cadence
Dropping QjackCtl in favour of Cadence? If so, that's utter nonsense!
You could provide Cadence, but you cannot move/migrate from QjackCtl to
Cadence, since this would break the workflow for a majority of Ub
> On Mar 31, 2018, at 4:56 AM, eylul wrote:
>
> I believe this was in our todo list. :) Some of the changes FalkTX is making
> might actually make it easier for these to be included in the debian repos.
> Another option is to see if we can get it into ubuntu repos.
> Best
>
> Eylul
>
> On 0
I believe this was in our todo list. :) Some of the changes FalkTX is
making might actually make it easier for these to be included in the
debian repos. Another option is to see if we can get it into ubuntu repos.
Best
Eylul
On 03/30/2018 08:06 PM, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 30, 2018,
> On Mar 30, 2018, at 7:17 AM, Set Hallström wrote:
>
> On March 30, 2018 4:12:34 PM GMT+02:00, Set Sakrecoer
> wrote:
>> On March 30, 2018 12:17:51 PM GMT+02:00, Lord Jonathan Moore
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was looking at the replace-qjackctl-a blueprint and think Candace
>>> would
>>>
On March 30, 2018 4:12:34 PM GMT+02:00, Set Sakrecoer
wrote:
>On March 30, 2018 12:17:51 PM GMT+02:00, Lord Jonathan Moore
> wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I was looking at the replace-qjackctl-a blueprint and think Candace
>>would
>>be better it is faster to use than patchage. And looks more organized
>>with
On March 30, 2018 12:17:51 PM GMT+02:00, Lord Jonathan Moore
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was looking at the replace-qjackctl-a blueprint and think Candace
>would
>be better it is faster to use than patchage. And looks more organized
>with
>a ladish session. I would like an opinion on ladish vs jack,
>
>
>Th
Hi,
I was looking at the replace-qjackctl-a blueprint and think Candace would
be better it is faster to use than patchage. And looks more organized with
a ladish session. I would like an opinion on ladish vs jack,
Thanks,
jdm7dv
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ub
16 matches
Mail list logo