Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper, WAS:Re: ART TEAM ALERT! 16.04 Wallpaper Contest has been decided.

2016-02-19 Thread Jimmy Sjölund
On 17 February 2016 09:34:32 +01:00, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:58 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:54 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > > > > > I already sent an email to the guy, but realized we have other concerns > > > too. For 14.04, the wallpaper

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper, WAS:Re: ART TEAM ALERT! 16.04 Wallpaper Contest has been decided.

2016-02-17 Thread lukefromdc
"Found on the Internet" could be those bastards at Getty Images, who would get a lot of free publicity for their extortion letters from a well publicized even though failed demand letter against Canonical. Don't use unknown source images unless everyone involved is OK with standing up to extorti

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper, WAS:Re: ART TEAM ALERT! 16.04 Wallpaper Contest has been decided.

2016-02-17 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:58 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:54 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > I already sent an email to the guy, but realized we have other concerns > > too. For 14.04, the wallpaper was not just a wallpaper. It was a theme > > used for all our social channel

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper, WAS:Re: ART TEAM ALERT! 16.04 Wallpaper Contest has been decided.

2016-02-16 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:54 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > I already sent an email to the guy, but realized we have other concerns > too. For 14.04, the wallpaper was not just a wallpaper. It was a theme > used for all our social channels. If we want to continue to have a > generic theme, which we us

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper, WAS:Re: ART TEAM ALERT! 16.04 Wallpaper Contest has been decided.

2016-02-16 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 02:56 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > I like HotWheel. I'm slightly bothered by the CoF not being in the > middle of the image. I'm sure the artist wanted to make up for the > flames on the left side, but it gives it a slightly skewed impression to > me. Also, it's a bit upward fr