Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Our Set of Freedesktop Categories, WAS:Re: Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-23 Thread Len Ovens
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Set Hallstrom wrote: Actualy, maybe it's a good idea. I was looking closer at the graphics software list and these seem like good candidate for a X-GraphicsUtility category : Ristretto (viewer) Entangle (wireless camera management) Rapid Photo Downloader (memory card/

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Our Set of Freedesktop Categories, WAS:Re: Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-23 Thread Set Hallstrom
On 2015-06-22 16:16, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: I had a go at updating this page to what seems appropriate right now - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/FreedesktopCategories It's all straight from the Freedesktop standard, except for a few additions/changes. Good job!! ## X-Typography Not

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Our Set of Freedesktop Categories, WAS:Re: Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-23 Thread Set Hallstrom
On 2015-06-23 12:32, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: I just meant that you are better at deciding all of those things. :) ok *blush* i will do my best to face those expectations with dignity. Yes, I gathered as much. I will remove it, since I don't think anyone actually asked to have it there. For

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Our Set of Freedesktop Categories, WAS:Re: Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-23 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: On 2015-06-22 16:16, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: I had a go at updating this page to what seems appropriate right now - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/FreedesktopCategories It's all straight from the Freedesktop standard, except for a

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Our Set of Freedesktop Categories, WAS:Re: Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
Also, I remember we were talking about Utility applications, but for Audio or Video, or even Graphics. Does this work? X-AudioUtilty X-VideoUtility X-GraphicsUtility -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Our Set of Freedesktop Categories, WAS:Re: Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-22 Thread Len Ovens
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: There's AudioVideoEditing, but no AudioEditing and no VideoEditing. Perhaps those two should be added as well? Ardour uses AudioEditing, but the debian packager takes it out (Lintian probably coughs). I think one could filter using AudioVideoEditing

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Our Set of Freedesktop Categories, WAS:Re: Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
There's AudioVideoEditing, but no AudioEditing and no VideoEditing. Perhaps those two should be added as well? -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Our Set of Freedesktop Categories, WAS:Re: Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
I had a go at updating this page to what seems appropriate right now - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/FreedesktopCategories It's all straight from the Freedesktop standard, except for a few additions/changes. DiscBurning is deemed not to belong to AudioVideo. But, there is no immediate

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Our Set of Freedesktop Categories, WAS:Re: Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
Sorry, I almost forgot one of the custom categories we already had before hand. ## X-Processing (Audio;AudioVideo) Another possible word would be Effects. Both seem ok to me, though Processing probably is the most technically correct -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list