I'm sure almost nobody starts to consider copying an executable off
the installation media and running it that way, but I agree even that
functionality should be removed.
.Timo
2015-08-22 21:10 GMT+03:00 :
> The linked post or one of it's replies warns of "bricking windows," if it is
> moved
>
The linked post or one of it's replies warns of "bricking windows," if it is
moved
off the disk, the exe file executed from the windows drive, and installer mode
selected. I have no idea if that is true or not, but be sure to do any testing
of this beyond the "reboot greeter" on an expendable in
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> Didn't
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2015-August/015757.html
> just tell wubi has had only a simple "please reboot" functionality for
> a long time, but causing confusion since it's still named wubi, and
> all the d
Didn't
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2015-August/015757.html
just tell wubi has had only a simple "please reboot" functionality for
a long time, but causing confusion since it's still named wubi, and
all the documentation everywhere?
It's useful that there's a dialog popp
I have only used wubi to install Ubuntu, and my experience with that is
not exactly great. The virtual hard drive is really, really slow. I fear
that even if Ubuntu Studio works with wubi, it will give the user a bad
impression.
So, there's that too.
I could give it a try on a Win8 machine during
There's enough buggy UEFI setups out there that I advise people to never buy
new anymore without searching the exact model they plan to buy online along
with the word "Ubuntu" and/or "Linux" to see what pops up. Long has this been
so for printers and wireless devices, not it's also true for laptop
On Thursday, August 20, 2015, C. F. Howlett wrote:
> As I understand it, wubi has not been supported, developed or upgraded for
> YEARS. Moreover, wubi is known to conflict with Ubuntu 13.XX and newer.
> So WHY is wubi not only present in the Ubuntu ecosystem, but actually
> packaged with Ubuntu
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
Has anyone with a Windows box tested it lately?
Our upstairs windows have window boxes on them. There are flowers there.
On 8/21/2015 at 10:39 AM, "Jimmy Sjölund" wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Kaj Ailomaa
wrote:
Anyone f
Has anyone with a Windows box tested it lately?
On 8/21/2015 at 10:39 AM, "Jimmy Sjölund" wrote:
>
>On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Kaj Ailomaa
> wrote:
>
>> Anyone feel any love for wubi at all?
>>
>> If not, I will make sure it is removed from Ubuntu Studio at
>least. I'm
>> guessing it nev
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> Anyone feel any love for wubi at all?
>
> If not, I will make sure it is removed from Ubuntu Studio at least. I'm
> guessing it never worked for Ubuntu Studio anyway?
>
> I have never used it, but seen questions when people have issues with i
Anyone feel any love for wubi at all?
If not, I will make sure it is removed from Ubuntu Studio at least. I'm
guessing it never worked for Ubuntu Studio anyway?
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
As I understand it, wubi has not been supported, developed or upgraded for
YEARS. Moreover, wubi is known to conflict with Ubuntu 13.XX and newer. So
WHY is wubi not only present in the Ubuntu ecosystem, but actually packaged
with Ubuntu .iso's?
For the love of kittens, puppies and all tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
