When something is actually released into the public domain it is not under
the GPL, CC or any other license and everyone is in fact free to use it for
anything and in any way. From what I've heard the reason Linux et all are
NOT simply released into the public domain is to prevent an "embrace,
exte
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:06:07 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 11:42 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:16:38 +, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote:
>> > the images are all in public domain
>> that's good :). Possibly there is the need to add the
>> copyright/copylef
On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 11:42 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:16:38 +, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote:
> > the images are all in public domain
> that's good :). Possibly there is the need to add the
> copyright/copyleft holders to a license file for packages or a footer
> to the web
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:16:38 +, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote:
>the images are all in public domain
Hi Jóhann,
that's good :). Possibly there is the need to add the copyright/copyleft
holders to a license file for packages or a footer to the website. This
might depend to the kind of license/public
Ralf the images are all in public domain (no licences, norestrictions) I
can even put cc licence on it after my changes to them.
and yes Elle stone is the creator of the color profile that krita uses by
default.,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:00:01
