PPS:
Regarding the fractal effect for the "front page". Indeed, it's
possible to even use just logs, quasi a more or less neutral envelope. I
prefer sexy lingerie over a neutral envelope or something more
neutral, than even logs.
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:14:23 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote:
>On 2016-06-14 10:10, Set Hallstrom wrote:
>> In fact it made me realize that i didn't ask for anything to
>> illustrate the first section of the feature tour, that outlines what
>> U-S is more broadly. That would be the place for the logo
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:10:52 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote:
>On 2016-06-13 20:44, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> PS: Assumed the CoF is else were on the website, then replacing it by
>> the category icons makes sense
>
>In fact it made me realize that i didn't ask for anything to illustrate
>the first
On 2016-06-14 10:10, Set Hallstrom wrote:
> In fact it made me realize that i didn't ask for anything to illustrate
> the first section of the feature tour, that outlines what U-S is more
> broadly. That would be the place for the logo as placed in Geirdal's
> proposals. It would also be a great
Hi Ralf!
Thanks for getting involved Ralf!
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 20:31:51 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:25:20 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote:
Why not
>>> try?
>>>
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 20:31:51 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:25:20 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote:
>>Like Ralf says, it has little to do with the workflow, but you could
>>fix that by replacing the CoF by the Category icons maybe? Why not
>>try?
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:25:20 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote:
>Like Ralf says, it has little to do with the workflow, but you could
>fix that by replacing the CoF by the Category icons maybe? Why not try?
belated reply. :)
pretty much what everybody said so far. 2 very minor opinions.
If and only if you still have the larger files, actually having a larger
resolution might be a good idea. one layout we were working with uses
the full width. if you don't have them, it is no big deal. we'll make
On 2016-06-13 18:09, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote:
> Hi here is my first try on this http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0
\o/ yeah! you deliver! Looks real cool! It's the first shot, and i'm
sure we can get it even cooler with a few rounds of execution/feedback
pingpong!!
The font will be "ubuntu
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:56:49 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:09:17 +, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote:
>>Hi here is my first try on this http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0
>
>Pro:
>
>Excellent legibility, IOW good contrast between font and picture.
>Classic arrangement
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:09:17 +, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote:
>Hi here is my first try on this http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0
Pro:
Excellent legibility, IOW good contrast between font and picture.
Classic arrangement regarding the transparent logo and it's position.
Con:
The background
Hi here is my first try on this http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:00 PM, <
ubuntu-studio-devel-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Send ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list submissions to
> ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via
12 matches
Mail list logo
