On 2011-01-27 17:13, Scott Lavender wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:25 AM, David Henningsson
mailto:david.hennings...@canonical.com>> wrote:
What is really the current status of the lowlatency kernel? Are we
planning to have it in universe for Natty? If so, is any work going
on in
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Scott Lavender
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Scott Lavender > wrote:
>
>> My experience is that the -lowlatency performs in a far superior manner
>> than the -generic one for audio work.
>>
>> Using my Dell P4, 2.8ghz machine with 3 gigs memory a
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Scott Lavender
wrote:
> My experience is that the -lowlatency performs in a far superior manner
> than the -generic one for audio work.
>
> Using my Dell P4, 2.8ghz machine with 3 gigs memory and an MAudio Delta 44
> card I test the -generic kernel using JACK and
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:25 AM, David Henningsson <
david.hennings...@canonical.com> wrote:
> What is really the current status of the lowlatency kernel? Are we planning
> to have it in universe for Natty? If so, is any work going on in that area?
>
Alessio answered most of these questions, howe
On 2011-01-26 23:52, Tim Cook wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 16:35 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Also, do we have any signs of this kernel performing better than the generic
one?
Users (aka Ubuntu Studio developers, testers and users) should say
that. Sorry I couldn't provide that certainty
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 16:35 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> > Also, do we have any signs of this kernel performing better than the generic
> > one?
>
> Users (aka Ubuntu Studio developers, testers and users) should say
> that. Sorry I couldn't provide that certainty.
I can say qualitatively
David,
2011/1/26 David Henningsson :
> What is really the current status of the lowlatency kernel? Are we planning
> to have it in universe for Natty? If so, is any work going on in that area?
It is sync-ed with the generic one. Binaries are available in my PPA
(https://launchpad.net/~abogani/+ar
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:25 AM, David Henningsson
wrote:
> What is really the current status of the lowlatency kernel? Are we planning
> to have it in universe for Natty? If so, is any work going on in that area?
>
> I talked to Andy Whitcroft yesterday about providing "derivative flavour"
> doc
